RCTACameron
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 1,597
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- WCA ID
- 2010STOL01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
There are two ways to do an average (we'll say it's an average of five):
1. Do five solves, and just get the average of them.
2. Do the solves, take out the best and worst times, and get the average of the 3 remaining.
Obviously, the WCA uses the second one, and I've had to use it in the weekly competition. However, when I'm practicing, I've always used the first option.
Recently, I did a 2x2 avg of 12. I didn't actually just say "I'm going to do it now", I waited until I got a good solve, then counted that as my first solve.
Also, with this average, I got a DNF. I was using the first method for the average, so I decided to just ignore the DNF and average the 11 solves, but still call it an average of 12.
I have been trying to get a sub-5 avg 12 for a while. With the first method (technically being and avg 11), I got 4.95. I was excited.
However, If I had of used the second method, it sadly would have been a 5.06 avg.
So, here are my questions:
1. Which method do you use? (I know, most people will say #2)
2. If I do switch to method #2, should I still count myself as having a 4.95 average?
3. Do you think it's fair that I just averaged 11 solves and counted it as an avg 12?
4. Do you think it's okay that I waited until I had a good solve, and then counted it as the first of my average?
1. Do five solves, and just get the average of them.
2. Do the solves, take out the best and worst times, and get the average of the 3 remaining.
Obviously, the WCA uses the second one, and I've had to use it in the weekly competition. However, when I'm practicing, I've always used the first option.
Recently, I did a 2x2 avg of 12. I didn't actually just say "I'm going to do it now", I waited until I got a good solve, then counted that as my first solve.
Also, with this average, I got a DNF. I was using the first method for the average, so I decided to just ignore the DNF and average the 11 solves, but still call it an average of 12.
I have been trying to get a sub-5 avg 12 for a while. With the first method (technically being and avg 11), I got 4.95. I was excited.
However, If I had of used the second method, it sadly would have been a 5.06 avg.
So, here are my questions:
1. Which method do you use? (I know, most people will say #2)
2. If I do switch to method #2, should I still count myself as having a 4.95 average?
3. Do you think it's fair that I just averaged 11 solves and counted it as an avg 12?
4. Do you think it's okay that I waited until I had a good solve, and then counted it as the first of my average?