Blindfolded rules did not apply. For this record, only articles 3 and 4 of WCA regulations are considered. It was the same way for Cubestormer. If you consider that unfair, consider this. With six arms and two cameras, all of the faces are functionally identical because they can all be turned and seen at any given time. This is unlike both other bots and human solvers. Because of this, the robot will reliably generate the same solution to the cube regardless of orientation, it will just use different arms to apply the solution. If you simply tilted your head and watched the same cube being solved from a different orientation, it would appear to be the same solve. Additionally, all scramble states are still achievable, just not with every color. The actual color representing each piece does not make a difference to the robot. In fact, colors aren't even kept track of by the computer, only the face to which they need to move toward, which is determined immediately upon scanning. Additionally, if it is the time taken to scan the six stickers (or rather two additional stickers, as that is all that is necessary to determine orientation), consider the fact that the entire scan and solution generation (more computationally expensive than scanning) is done in less than a tenth of a second. The stopwatch error alone added four tenths of a second to the time. The robot could have scanned approximately a million additional stickers in that time. Regardless, it did play by the same rules Cubestormer had.