Dan Brown's New Video

Maybe, but you assume the target audience is geriatric or infant. The majority of Dan's audience would have no trouble understanding him, as most of his other videos are a LOT harder to follow than this.
 
I have mixed feelings about him re-making these vids.

The good thing is that he's introducing more people the cubing. The bad thing is that he's teaching (well, reteaching) a slow/inefficient method. He's also going way too quickly, which in turn is going to frustrate viewers/make them give up with the cube. Then again, the method is just for someone who wants a simple and easy way to solve it.

I have a feeling that he really just wants more views. These new vids are using the same method, only making things more clear. Putting them in several parts (what, 8?) = about 8 times as many views.

~Rook
 
The reason Dan Brown's video is so popular is because he doesn't use too much technical language and his method is very easy. Most people new to the cube are just impressed if they can do it at all, whether it's in 5 or 10 minutes. A lot of people don't know that it can be solved or that there is a method at all. When people say that it goes too fast sometimes they mean that all their questions were not answered. Also sometimes people say "just do this" and then kind of whip through it without the viewer understanding what the cubies are doing.

Badmephisto's videos are very good because you understand what he is talking about and he never seems to go his full speed. You can clearly see what is going on. His beginner method has a good transition to speedcubing, but most people just want to solve the thing and aren't really worried about their average of 5, pll time attacks, finger tricks...

Every year I teach about 25-30 students to solve the cube but I don't really recommend any beginner tutorials. If students do watch any they usually tell me they didn't understand what the heck any of them were talking about. I really think you guys would be suprised at the failure rate of youtube videos to teach the average person to solve the cube. Most people figure it's not worth the trouble. Using the numbers I have now, about 10% of students can learn from an online video and about 60% learn from coming to my cubing classes. Most don't succeed because they didn't realize you actually have to learn something and they think it's too hard so they just don't come anymore.

I think getting more people to solve it in general will be good for cubing, they don't need to learn a method that transitions them into competitive speedcubing if it causes 90% of people to not even follow through with learning how to solve the cube.

When students get kind of fast (1:00-1:30) and they ask me what shortcuts can I show them then I tell them about badmephisto. I haven't had much trouble transitioning those who want to be faster from Dan Brown method to a faster method.

Anyway, that's my 3 cents. Sorry if it's kind of long, but I try to get as many people as I can to be able solve the Rubik's Cube and I worry about their speed when they are ready to move on. Many are happy just to be able to solve one and will not go to speedcubing, but they do appreciate cubing more in general. I think any videos about cubing are great, but none of the beginner method videos have everything that I look for to teach students.
 
Last edited:
I really can't see much difference in speed between his tutorial and badmephistos. I think there may just be some prejudice going on, his tutorial is completely valid, except for the horrible method.
 
Hello Dan Brown,

In your new tutorials, you chose to use 2U to represent a double turn of the U-layer. The overwhelmingly standard notation for this is U2, and 2U, if anything, has a different meaning. Every Rubik's cube expert in the world, every world record holder, even every intermediate cuber, would tell you this, and if you really want, I can have them tell you.
I don't think you realize this, but by telling this to a lot of beginners (your videos, if not accurate in notation, are still appealing to new people with a cube), you are making things very difficult for us. It's like teaching children the wrong order of operations for arithmetic.

I appreciate your decision to move to the prime notation for counterclockwise, although I'd like to note that the prime is really just a normal apostrophe: F', not F′.

Is there any good reason for your choice of 2U, and is there any chance we could implore you to correct this?

»Lucas Garron
I don't even think he's going to look twice at that message amongst the thousands of thankyou letters from his fans. Maybe you should send him a letter? Also, you should address him calling cubies "cubelets". That made me cringe.
 
I wish more of my friends knew how to cube well so i could talk about cubing to people. I have a few friends who can solve the cube but none of them are speedcubers.
 
I really can't see much difference in speed between his tutorial and badmephistos. I think there may just be some prejudice going on, his tutorial is completely valid, except for the horrible method.

What else would people be not liking?

He goes too fast, he's not qualified to teach, the notation is wrong, he told people to lube with vaseline(more of a reason why it's obvious not to watch his videos), Dan Brown hate.
 
A thorn in our sides has to be coming up from me right now:
The puzzle consists of twenty-six unique miniature cubes, also called "cubies" or "cubelets".
That's from the official Wikipedia page. Look it up yourself. I got the idea to look again about a week back when I thought to myself, "Hey, some noob called it a cubelet." Turns out he was correct.
 
I viewed all the parts of the videos.

There is quite a few ways to cube notation. He for example, would use 2F, while the rest us use F2. Also I've seen F(power of -1 thing) for F' and Fi.

And he does not show the notation for the back side either.

I did not use his method to solve a 3x3x3, so I can't vouch for the method. But I use his method exactly for the top layer to solve the top layer of a megaminx though.
 
I learned from his old vid 2-3 years ago and I don't see why everyone is STILL bashing on him.
Yes, "cubelets" may annoy you, but I personally find that it sounds less juvenile than "cubies".
Okay, the 2F thing DID annoy me, but it doesn't take that much time to learn to switch from reading 2F to the more commonly used F2.

Okay, I do agree that the LL system he teaches isn't the best, but I think in terms of number of algs, it's not too bad. Also, if the person really wants to get faster, then they'll go through with learning more algorithms.
If they aren't going to learn new things to solve the cube faster, then how do they really expect to get faster? It's the same with school, you get as much out of it as you put in. "No pain, no gain"

I'd just rather people have a REAL reason to hate on him, not what I'm feeling like I'm seeing is a bunch of people thinking "Oh everyone hates him, let's do that too"

I'll break the trend and say what I need to because it's not really fair.
 
But Rikane, his vids give misleading info, which is bad for us actually.

But the person who is learning doesn't know that. They just want to learn. Like he said, if they really wanna get faster, they would go through the effort like a number of us have. We shouldn't blame him. He is just a person on youtube trying to teach. That's it.
 
Back
Top