• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Confusing stuff

Ravi

Regular
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
113
Location
Kirksville, MO, USA
WCA
2005FERN01
YouTube
Visit Channel
This is a place to put things that are really, really, really, really, really, really confusing. Here are a few examples:
"That that that is that is that that is is is not, but that that that is is is that that is is is." - a true statement, invented by yours truly :D
"Eschew obfuscation." - a hypocritical sentence invented by someone else
"I'm not asking you who's on second." "Who's on first!" "I don't know." "Oh, he's on third base, we're not talking about him right now." - "Who's on First?" (Abbott and Costello)
"Ann, while Bob had had "had", had had "had had". "Had had" had had a better effect on the teacher." - someone else (from this site)
 
Or, the variation of that (which I also invented), "How much ham could a hamster stir if a hamster could stir ham?"... or a combination of the two: "How much ham could a woodster chuck if a hamchuck could stir wood?" I also (co-)invented another one: "How far up could Chuck upchuck if Chuck could upchuck up?"
 
Back
Top