abunickabhi
Legend
Cool idea and ways to look at 7-simul method.
-
Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!
You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.
Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.
Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.
Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.
- Status
D
Deleted member 74176
Guest
Pretty cool! I don’t think this is faster than the regular execution method we’ve already been using (probably just as fast) because all the top solvers turn by “feeling” meaning that there is a distinct difference in force between +4 and +5, this style of turning has been proven over years to be the fastest. My main issue with this, however, is that he talks about the main issue that Oxford fixes is that you no longer have to “count” moves during the solve. I honestly don’t see that as an issue because counting moves goes away as you get faster. Once you reach a high enough turning speed, there’s no thinking in the solve, it all just comes naturally.
- Status
Similar threads
