• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easycreate your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Averageof12's Method Progression Thread | Starting New Projects

What should I work on first?

  • (2x2) TCEG-1

    Votes: 7 25.9%
  • (2x2) 1LWC

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • (3x3) WVLL

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • (4x4) Double Parity Alg

    Votes: 8 29.6%
  • (Pyraminx) L5E

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • (Skewb) L5CO

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • (Method) Petrus4-7

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • (Method)(Pyraminx) EOMethod

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • (Method) ZZ4-7

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • (2x2) 2TCLL

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • (2x2) CBL

    Votes: 5 18.5%
  • (Method)(Clock) Layer by Layer

    Votes: 5 18.5%
  • (Method/Algset) FTO APB

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • (Algset) Skewb L6CO

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • (Method) Some New 3x3 Method, idk

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • (Algset)(2x2) OBL (A subset of CBL)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .
Skewb has the highest vote, that is what I will work on ffor algset.
which method would you prefer: Pyra EO or Clock Layer by layer?
For pyra eo, what gen are you even reducing it to? Because 3 gen messes with eo. Only 2 gen doesn’t. And that would mean one edge would have to be solved aka The petrus pyra method I showed earlier.
 
Skewb L5CO stands for Last 5 Corners Orientation. First you create a face that is missing a corner, then while inserting that corner, you orient the top layer corners. I estimate only 9 basic algs (2 possible LL cases, 4 orientations for each+1 1move case).
So you solve all of the corners with one center, but in like 2 steps, and then you do L5C, L4C or L3C
 
Has anyone heard of this?

Beginner-
1. 2x2x3 OR EO
2. EO OR 2x2x3
3. Finish off F2L with a 1x2x3
4. ZBLL

Advanced-
1. 2x2x3+EO
2. Finish off F2L with a 1x2x3
3. ZBLL

Expert-
1. 2x2x3+EO
2. Finish off F2L+ELL
3. COLL

I suppose this is just advanced Petrus, except for the Expert variation...
 
Last edited:
Has anyone heard of this?

Beginner-
1. 2x2x3 OR EO
2. EO OR 2x2x3
3. Finish off F2L with a 1x2x3
4. ZBLL

Advanced-
1. 2x2x3+EO
2. Finish off F2L with a 1x2x3
3. ZBLL

Expert-
1. 2x2x3+EO
2. Finish off F2L+ELL
3. COLL

I suppose this is just advanced Petrus, except for the Expert variation...
The expert one is actually terrible. You wouldn’t do COLL, u would do L4C (as COLL messed with edge permutation). I am pretty sure L4C is the worst set of ZZLL which is the worst set of zbll. Also for doing RB+ELL u could do LPELL. I don’t believe the recog is good tho.
 
The expert one is actually terrible. You wouldn’t do COLL, u would do L4C (as COLL messed with edge permutation). I am pretty sure L4C is the worst set of ZZLL which is the worst set of zbll. Also for doing RB+ELL u could do LPELL. I don’t believe the recog is good tho.
My B, I meant L4C.
 
Back
Top