Averageof12's Method Progression Thread | Starting New Projects

What should I work on first?

  • (2x2) TCEG-1

    Votes: 7 25.9%
  • (2x2) 1LWC

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • (3x3) WVLL

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • (4x4) Double Parity Alg

    Votes: 8 29.6%
  • (Pyraminx) L5E

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • (Skewb) L5CO

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • (Method) Petrus4-7

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • (Method)(Pyraminx) EOMethod

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • (Method) ZZ4-7

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • (2x2) 2TCLL

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • (2x2) CBL

    Votes: 5 18.5%
  • (Method)(Clock) Layer by Layer

    Votes: 5 18.5%
  • (Method/Algset) FTO APB

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • (Algset) Skewb L6CO

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • (Method) Some New 3x3 Method, idk

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • (Algset)(2x2) OBL (A subset of CBL)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .
I did some research and could not find anything about the Pyraminx EO method or TEG already existing. So @OtaMota and @Twisted101 do you know of resources I could check out?
Nigel made the doc in July 2023.

Also, there are comments on YT that have talked about TEG since 2013, specifically comments on Chris Olsen vid of TCLL
 
so 1LWC is obviously out the window. what about if you made a bar and then solved it in one alg? This should reduce the number of cases, correct?
This includes being color neutral. This would still have tons of cases.
You could try making this, but it might not be worth it as often it would be better to cancel into an LS or EG. This would have a LOT of algs still, think about the amount of times you seen a presolved bar in a 2x2 scramble. This algset would have an alg for every single one of those cases.
 
i think it would be fster to just do 2 seprate algs
It's not just about the speed of doing 1 alg vs. 2. pausing to recognize PLL parity and thinking about which side to do it from is annoying. The same is sort of true for OLL parity. If you don't practice enough, you could give yourself bad cases.
 
It's not just about the speed of doing 1 alg vs. 2. pausing to recognize PLL parity and thinking about which side to do it from is annoying. The same is sort of true for OLL parity. If you don't practice enough, you could give yourself bad cases.
R' U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw2 U2 x' U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Lw' U2 Rw U2 Rw R

here is an alg I found that does both pll and oll parity. It has existed for a while and I am tired of seeing u suffer trying to make an alg.
 
Back
Top