cuBerBruce
Member
If someone could check that out and let me know.
Looks like ply-1 is working...
It looks wrong to me. You should only have 4 new configurations at depth 1.
From solved, R and R' produce the same orientation configuration. Cubicles URB and DRF will each contain a cubie that is twisted clockwise, and cubicles UFR and DBR will contain counter-clockwise twisted cubies.
If you're using (DLB),UFR,ULF,URB,DRF,ULB,DFL,DBR cublicle ordering, the base 3 number should look like (0)2011002. This should give 1568 decimal. Your value of 84 (for R) would correspond to a base 3 number of (?)0010001, and it doesn't have any 2's (well, one if the "(?)" is a 2, but it actually needs to be 1 for the digits to add to 0 modulo 3) for the counterclockwise-twisted cubicles, so it doesn't make sense to me.
EDIT (appending):
I've now finished analyzing the distance distribution for the 3x3x1 block pruning table in single slice turn metric and block turn metric.
Code:
3x3x1 block:
Single slice turn metric:
dist 0: count = 1 total 1
dist 1: count = 18 total 19
dist 2: count = 348 total 367
dist 3: count = 6969 total 7336
dist 4: count = 127662 total 134998
dist 5: count = 2183800 total 2318798
dist 6: count = 31940635 total 34259433
dist 7: count = 328348722 total 362608155
dist 8: count = 1463547678 total 1826155833
dist 9: count = 879470589 total 2705626422
dist 10: count = 4258602 total 2709885024
Block turn metric:
dist 0: count = 1 total 1
dist 1: count = 18 total 19
dist 2: count = 455 total 474
dist 3: count = 11271 total 11745
dist 4: count = 266161 total 277906
dist 5: count = 5722833 total 6000739
dist 6: count = 96340321 total 102341060
dist 7: count = 882894514 total 985235574
dist 8: count = 1638637904 total 2623873478
dist 9: count = 86011474 total 2709884952
dist 10: count = 72 total 2709885024
Last edited: