An interesting way to measure the quality of a WCA profile

[Robert-Y]

First you take your current personal records from your WCA profile.
Then you compare these records against the world records for each year. You keep going back a year until that record is sufficient enough to be the world record at the end of that year. Finally, you subtract 2000 from that year to get your "score".

If your record isn't good enough to break any world records for any year of this millenium, you get 0
I've omitted Skewb because your score is probably 0 except for two guys.

e.g. for Daniel Sheppard: https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/results/p.php?i=2009SHEP01


[table="width: 300"]
[tr]
[td]Event[/td]
[td]Single[/td]
[td]Average[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3x3[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4x4[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]5x5[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]2x2[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3BLD[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]OH[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]FM[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[td]12[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Feet[/td]
[td]6[/td]
[td]6[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Megaminx[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Pyraminx[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Square-1[/td]
[td]6[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Clock[/td]
[td]10[/td]
[td]10[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]6x6[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]7x7[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4BLD[/td]
[td]11[/td]
[td]N/A[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]5BLD[/td]
[td]11[/td]
[td]N/A[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Multi BLD[/td]
[td]10[/td]
[td]N/A[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

This isn't really a serious post, just an interesting thought

 

[TDM]

My WCA profile is old (I've improved by ~8 seconds at 3x3 since the only comp I've been to), but here's what I get:

[table="width: 500"]
[tr]
[td]Event[/td]
[td]Single[/td]
[td]Average[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3x3[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3OH[/td]
[td]4[/td]
[td]4[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4x4[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]2x2[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

21 total, im so pro

 

[cmhardw]

My scores:

[table="width: 300"]
[tr]
[td]Event[/td]
[td]Single[/td]
[td]Average[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3x3[/td]
[td]4[/td]
[td]4[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4x4[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]5x5[/td]
[td]4[/td]
[td]4[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]2x2[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3BLD[/td]
[td]6[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]OH[/td]
[td]4[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4BLD[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[td]N/A[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]5BLD[/td]
[td]10[/td]
[td]N/A[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Multi BLD[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]N/A[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

85 total score.

 

[uberCuber]

[table="width: 300"]
[tr]
[td]Event[/td]
[td]Single[/td]
[td]Average[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3x3[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4x4[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]5x5[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]2x2[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3BLD[/td]
[td]6[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]OH[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]FM[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]no[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Feet[/td]
[td]shouldn't[/td]
[td]be an event[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Megaminx[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Pyraminx[/td]
[td]6[/td]
[td]6[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Square-1[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Clock[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]6x6[/td]
[td]10[/td]
[td]10[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]7x7[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Multi BLD[/td]
[td]7[/td]
[td]N/A[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

184 total, not too bad

 

[10461394944000]

3x3 - 7, 9
4x4 - 8, 8
5x5 - 7, 7
2x2 - 10, 9
3bld - 5, 5
oh - 6, 6
fmc - 0, 9
feet - 4, 5
mega - 7, 6
pyra - 5, 6
sq1 - 6, 5
clock - 3, 0
6x6 - 0, 0
7x7 - 0, 0
4bld - 0
5bld - 5
mbld - 0

total = 148

 

[antoineccantin]

3x3 - 8, 10
4x4 - 10, 10
5x5 - 8, 8
2x2 - 8, 8
3bld - 7, 0
oh - 11, 13
fmc - 0, 0
feet - 6, 8
mega - 8, 7
pyra - 9, 9
sq1 - 6, 6
clock - 6, 6
6x6 - 0, 0
7x7 - 0, 0
4bld - 5
5bld - 0
mbld - 7

total = 184

 

[Coolster01]

This isnt very clear. When you say to go to the year sufficient enough, would it be the record at the end or beginning of the year that you have to check? Because in the example it seems to be a mix o.O

 

[uberCuber]

This isnt very clear. When you say to go to the year sufficient enough, would it be the record at the end or beginning of the year that you have to check? Because in the example it seems to be a mix o.O

I used the record at the end of the year

184 total

total = 184

woah, did not expect that with your sum of ranks being so much better

 

[TDM]

This isnt very clear. When you say to go to the year sufficient enough, would it be the record at the end or beginning of the year that you have to check? Because in the example it seems to be a mix o.O

I used this.

 

[Coolster01]

I used the record at the end of the year





woah, did not expect that with your sum of ranks being so much better

Antoine used beginning, just by looking at his 3x3 single. So you have more points than him :O

 

[ryanj92]

Event Single Average
3x3 3 3
4x4 6 7
5x5 4 4
2x2 7 6
3BLD 0 0
OH 4 4
FM 0 0
Feet 4 6
Megaminx 5 0
Pyraminx 5 6
Square-1 3 0
Clock 9 9
6x6 0 0
7x7 0 0
4BLD 0 N/A
5BLD 0 N/A
Multi BLD 0 N/A
total = 95
Not bad, for now...

 

[BrianJ]

Event Single Average
2x2 7 9
3x3 6 6
4x4 5 7
5x5 3 3
OH 6 6
Mega 4 0
SQ-1 3 0
Clock 3 0

68 points in total .

 

[uyneb2000]

3x3 - 8, 7
4x4 - 8, 8
5x5 - 6, 7
2x2 - 7, 8
OH - 4, 5
Mega - 5, 0

Total score is 60.

 

[CHJ]

3x3 - 6, 6
4x4 - 7, 7
5x5 - 7, 6
6x6 - NA, NA
7x7 - NA, NA
2x2 - 7, 7
OH - 6, 7
3BLD - 7, 7
4BLD - 10
5BLD - 10
MBLD - 8
FMC - NA, 10
FT - 6, 8
Mega - 7, 7
Pyra - 7, 6
Sq-1 - 3, 5
Clock - 8, NA
skewb - LOLOLOL

Total 172, noice (175 if clock avg was in 2003 but whatev's)

 

[Robert-Y]

This isnt very clear. When you say to go to the year sufficient enough, would it be the record at the end or beginning of the year that you have to check? Because in the example it seems to be a mix o.O

End of the year, sorry. Thanks for bringing that up.

Also it seems that this measure does seem like a good indicator about a competitors best events, don't you think?

 

[jonlin]

3x3: 4 5
2x2: 4 4
4x4: 2 2 (that's just sad)
5x5: 1 0 (that's even more sad)
6x6: 0 0 (D: )
7x7: 0 0
OH : 4 4
BLD: 1
Mega: 2
Pyra: 3 4
SQ1: 0 0
Clock: 1 0

And that's 41.
D:

 

[Nathan Dwyer]

Event Single Average
3x3 7 9
4x4 7 8
5x5 6 6
2x2 7 6
3BLD 4 0
OH 9 8
FM 0 0
Megaminx 6 6
Pyraminx 5 6
Square-1 8 8
Clock 7 6
6x6 0 0
7x7 0 0
Multi BLD 0 N/A

 

[Ranzha]

3x3: 5, 6
BLD: 4, 0
FMC: 0, 0
Square-1: 3, 0
Skewb: 14, 0
Multi: 0

32

For only competing in six events, I don't think this is so bad

 

[Ninja Storm]

I would be a world record speedcuber in 2008.

Woo.

 

[pewpewrawr]

2x2: 0 0
3x3: 0 0
4x4: 0 0
5x5: 0 0
6x6: 0 0
7x7: 0 0
oh: 0 0
fmc: 0 0
feet: 0 0
mega: 0 0
pyra: 0 0
square-1: 0 0
clock: 0 0
3bld: 0 0
4bld: 0 0
5bld: 0 0
multi-bld: 0 0

0