I'd say that your bias is influencing you. The two aren't even comparable anyway, since you're timing LL vs LL+LS.Fast megaminx solvers have been telling me that it is better for beginners.Beginners have been telling me that it's better for them.
I wouldn't say the last slot adds on 4 extra seconds.I'm not saying its a bad method, I actually would recommend it for all beginners, but I am saying that its not as fast as 4 look LL.
I wouldn't say the last slot adds on 4 extra seconds.I'm not saying its a bad method, I actually would recommend it for all beginners, but I am saying that its not as fast as 4 look LL.And why might that be? Give me some meat with your statement.
Actually, I can do it as quickly as 4-look beginners LS+LL (EO, EP, CP, CO)
It's much slower than my standard LL that I do now, but I suppose that was to be expected.
I would recommend that any beginner who wants to find an easy and fast LL system should look into using this, because it is good for that purpose.
I think maybe you could be just a little bit less confrontational, and actually respect people's opinions.
While it's still subjective, I'd appreciate it if people could provide some movecounts/times along with claims that "X is faster than Y", or at least an explanation of why they feel that way, and why they're qualified to make that judgement.
Edit: I missed that some people did, but there's still a lot of claims that I would accept right away with some numbers.