A new method to solve the F2L of the Rubik's Cube?!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I find that people on this forum in general are very harsh and critical

He is 12 and is exited by his find of a method -even if it is a variation -, I find it great that he share his ideas. Sure the first impression might be " look here I am" thats is somethig he can work on.

Give the cuber some credits, how many find a method on his own? Maybe he can colaborate how he came up with this idea. It could be that he tought of it on his own....

Any way it gave me some usefull idea's for FM, not the complete method but parts of it. We should look first to the positive site of a contribution, to be critical if very easy.....

Hope this feeback helps before you post critical or negative posts.....
Ton
 
Last edited:
Ahahaha this thread was fun
Yeah, very much reminded me of the so there's this kid on youtube thread. People have fun gang-bashing others. This thread here in particular gave me the impression people didn't care or think about the content but were just interested in joining the senseless bashing. The "kid on youtube" thread was worse, but at least had people reasoning, even though it was severely flawed.
 
All right I'll try to articulate better but its hard- I'm a very slow typer. Also, I'm only 12 if you want to know. Sorry if I was arrogant; I didnt mean to be. I've had about 30 people in total down rate my vid so that pissed me off... but Il try to improve. What's bad about how I presented my method?

PS the only reason I say ''Location: why should i tell you'' is because I dont want anyone to know where I live. My mom doesn't want me to tell that to strangers.
CorD,

That was an excellent post, articulate and grammatically correct, sooo much easier to read.

I'm sorry I was harsh on you earlier, I think the other posters in the thread have hit every topic that rubbed me the wrong way, so I leave it as having been covered. I particularly appreciate you being able to apologise, I think you've shown great character by doing so.

If you continue posting with this same care and attitude, I'm sure you will be quite well accepted in the community.

e.
 
I don't even try to focus all my f2l attention on efficiency and I can easily get lower move counts than 35 >.< I'm even a slow cuber at the 20 mark....
 
I think that you should create 2 1x1x3 lines, use COLL and finish the cube with U, M, and (GOODNESS GRACIOUS) E moves. If you make the 1x1x3 blocks into 1x2x3 blocks after COLL you could finish it with Roux.
 
All right I'll try to articulate better but its hard- I'm a very slow typer. Also, I'm only 12 if you want to know. Sorry if I was arrogant; I didnt mean to be. I've had about 30 people in total down rate my vid so that pissed me off... but Il try to improve. What's bad about how I presented my method?

PS the only reason I say ''Location: why should i tell you'' is because I dont want anyone to know where I live. My mom doesn't want me to tell that to strangers.
CorD,

That was an excellent post, articulate and grammatically correct, sooo much easier to read.

I'm sorry I was harsh on you earlier, I think the other posters in the thread have hit every topic that rubbed me the wrong way, so I leave it as having been covered. I particularly appreciate you being able to apologise, I think you've shown great character by doing so.

If you continue posting with this same care and attitude, I'm sure you will be quite well accepted in the community.

e.

Thanks for this response, I appreciate it. I'll try to work on attitude in the future(I've always had a problem with it.)lol
 
Two things. It's "block," not "bloc" you mean.

Are you claiming your method is block-building?
I fail to see how it's significantly more block-building than Fridrich.

As far as I know, most methods considered blockbuilding have work by extending block parts or creating entire new blocks at each step. Your method builds a column (I wouldn't really call it a block instead, due to its characteristics), inserts 4 edges, and continues.

But that's debatable, nd perhaps Kenneth has something good to say.

Not much, it is as always; nothing new to it, most methods are already explored by me and many others. Block building is neat, it saves turns and can be done in many ways. But the problem with it is, as said above, the look ahead, you need to find more pices for each operation. Using F2L you only need 2 at the time, for most block methods you need 3 or possibly 4 and that is slow to find. My average is about 10 turns more for F2L but it is still faster than any block method I know.

My method is a ''unique'' (check out description on first page)method, with a ''unique'' sort of block building. In each step you only put in place 2 or 3 pieces. Look ahead my be a problem, but it's not all that difficult, really. And another thing is that my method isn't only for speed but for FM as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top