TK 421
Veteran
Correction: 8.9
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
8.9 not 8.8
It was an 8.8, now it's an 8.9.
This was said 50 times already.
Yea it's hard to imagine, that earthquake was almost 1000x as powerful as the one we had a few weeks ago. It's completely insane.
(NZ 22feb) because of its very high Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) - recorded as high as 2.2 times gravity (!!!!) near the epicenter.
People will be so paranoid in New Zealand and all over the world even more than just a normal earthquake after the one in Christchurch any way I thought it was 8.9 still it makes it about 4th or 5th largest in history
I was sitting at my desk in San Francisco when it all began to happen. I trade the Japanese markets, and so my boss shouted over the turret (which is a fancy phone system) that the Nikkei futures were dropping like mad. (He cursed a lot more than that... quite colorful language really.) I look up and I see the yen spiking (it's a reverse currency, so that means it's devaluing), the Nikkei futures are tanking, and the US equity futures (S&P Mini futures) are dropping. Everything's going crazy... we're trying to figure out what's going on... and suddenly a broker says over the box, "We've got a massive earthquake here... we're all leaving the building." So I think to myself... well, that explains it.
Yeah, it's crazy how powerful some earthquakes are. The one in NZ as actually a lot more damaging than the magnitude alone would suggest, because of its very high Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) - recorded as high as 2.2 times gravity (!!!!) near the epicenter. A lot of NZ buildings were designed to be somewhat earthquake-proof, too. So the two earthquakes themselves (NZ and Japan) probably damaged buildings to a similar extent. Of course, the higher magnitude of the Japan one means much more danger from tsunamis... and that's something else entirely.
IMO, the "2012" thing has started quite a few years ago. As of now, Nature's problem seems to be us disturbing balance. However, eliminating humans completely doesn't help (as many other species are dependent on us). Hence, the "destruction of the world" is really something that manifests itself as distributed and comparatively small localized disasters as against the popular global mega-apocalypse. Think about it. Isn't it as good as the end of the world for those who have taken the full blow of the quakes and tsunamis?is this the beginning of 2012?