[Unofficial] 7.00 avg12

[Akiro]

Amazing!
Has anyone made a slowmo vid of these solves?

 

[Ickathu]

R2' u' R2 U R2' (y) R2 u R2' U' R2

ldo

that's actually a pretty awesome alg haha

 

[antoineccantin]

that's actually a pretty awesome alg haha

Optimal.

 

[JianhanC]

>11tps for LL on the 6.07...

is this UWR?

Don't think so, because Breandan can sub1 Y perm, and Y perm is already 17 moves.

 

[Akash Rupela]

Don't think so, because Breandan can sub1 Y perm, and Y perm is already 17 moves.

I think the point is doing fastest LL(non lucky) in an ACTUAL solve

 

[pdilla]

Shall the hunt for the UWR full-LL begin?

 

[Rubiks560]

Don't think so, because Breandan can sub1 Y perm, and Y perm is already 17 moves.

I can sub 1 a Y perm too...I'm sure many cubers can.

 

[JianhanC]

I think the point is doing fastest LL(non lucky) in an ACTUAL solve

I can sub 1 a Y perm too...I'm sure many cubers can.

My point. Sub1 Yperm is already quite doable by many cubers until being able to do it in a solve is very possible, even normal. Yperm is 17 moves. Sub1 means it's already definitely < 17 moves/s, not including OLL time.

 

[Erik]

I can sub 1 a Y perm too...I'm sure many cubers can.

No, the majority of people claming to be sub-1 at PLL's, time wrong and is actually slower.

 

[Escher]

No, the majority of people claming to be sub-1 at PLL's, time wrong and is actually slower.

The best way to time PLLs is to start with the cube not in your hands and use a stackmat

I currently have J perm at 1.01 and A perm 1.02 I think...

 

[That70sShowDude]

The best way to time PLLs is to start with the cube not in your hands and use a stackmat

I currently have J perm at 1.01 and A perm 1.02 I think...

With normal competition standard for timed solves? Mind destroyed.

 

[Kirjava]

The best way to time PLLs is to start with the cube not in your hands and use a stackmat

I currently have J perm at 1.01 and A perm 1.02 I think...

No one has sub1'd one yet. I have 1.03 A.

 

[A Leman]

The best way to time PLLs is to start with the cube not in your hands and use a stackmat

I currently have J perm at 1.01 and A perm 1.02 I think...

My A-perm is ~0.55 so conjugating with 2 moves that flow well with it means it's fast for me

As an aside, I would really like to see a turn metric based more on hand action than raw turns, I feel more and more like traditional notation doesn't encode enough... If I had more time on my hands I'd get it done myself.

What is the difference between timing the .55 Aperm and the 1.02 Aperm? Sorry if this is a nubb question. I just don't know better.

 

[Ickathu]

What is the difference between timing the .55 Aperm and the 1.02 Aperm? Sorry if this is a nubb question. I just don't know better.

the .55 starts with the cube in his hands probably, whilst the 1.02 has the cube on the table and using a stackmat competition style.

 

[uberCuber]

The best way to time PLLs is to start with the cube not in your hands and use a stackmat

I currently have J perm at 1.01 and A perm 1.02 I think...

It's funny because this is faster than my J perm starting with the cube in my hands

 

[KottenCube]

Dang he be good. Now how will I do that someday if it ever happens.

 

[Escher]

No one has sub1'd one yet. I have 1.03 A.

Nobody?

I have done 1.01 many times with A and J... I might have to try this a bunch tomorrow before somebody ultra fast sees this and beats me.

And yes to those who were asking, competition style start. It's really, really hard. Took me a while to get anything below 1.2 and I worked out how best to start with certain PLLs, and I'm still very inconsistent. For reference, my A is about .48 and J about .58 at best, although (as Erik rightly says) it's extremely easy to time incorrectly with cube in hands.

 

[cuber952]

Just got 0.96 A perm.

 

[MirzaCubing]

The best I got was 1.43 X(

 

[rowehessler]

just got .90 picking it up properly