guysensei1
Legend
I concur that the "incomplete cubes" solver in Cube Explorer is much slower than its regular optimal solver. Obviously, it is not creating a "huge" pruning table for use in this mode, or even using the existing huge table when no face restrictions are imposed.
Yes, whatever superflip requires, will be a lower bound. Because of its symmetry, it doesn't matter what orientation of the cube we use (or which face we make restricted). As I said in my previous post, we have that 5-gen superflip gives us a lower bound of 21, but the actual value could be higher, and thus could provide a better lower bound.
How did you know that all optimal superflips require the use of all 6 faces?