[WR] 3x3x3 single 5.55 Mats Valk

It's hard to compare this solve to Faz's single, because even thought this one had a lucky OLL skip Faz had a really easy x-cross. Both solves had exemplary look-ahead and TPS. Guess Felik's had higher TPS but both very deserving of the WR. Amazing.
 
Code:
[B]WR	Date		Days	Cuber		Competition[/B]
5.55	2013-03-03	617	Mats Valk	Zonhoven Open 2013
5.66	2011-25-06		Feliks Zemdegs	Melbourne Winter Open 2011

7.03	2010-11-13	853	Feliks Zemdegs	Melbourne Cube Day 2010
7.08	2008-13-07		Erik Akkersdijk	Czech Open 2008

5.55	2013-03-03	841	Mats Valk	Zonhoven Open 2013
7.03	2010-11-13		Feliks Zemdegs	Melbourne Cube Day 2010
 
Last edited:
Code:
[B]WR	Date		Days	Cuber		Competition[/B]
5.55	2013-03-03	617	Mats Valk	Zonhoven Open 2013
5.66	2011-25-06		Feliks Zemdegs	Melbourne Winter Open 2011

7.03	2010-11-13	853	Feliks Zemdegs	Melbourne Cube Day 2010
7.08	2008-13-07		Erik Akkersdijk	Czech Open 2008

>yyyy-dd-mm

gross
 
can't tell if trolling or new user
why so condescending? care to give a reason for belittling my opinion? all methods have a point where they bottom out and it improvement becomes almost non-existent. the bottom out point would obviously be lower for a method with less moves. this solve only needed one last layer alg, imagine if all solves were like this.
 
Also, Erik had WR single for a total of only 10 days longer than Faz had it for.
Going from 7.08 to 7.03 and 7.03 to 5.55.

source - Bobby d'Angelo

I don't think so.

Code:
[B]WR	Date		Days	Cuber		Competition[/B]
5.55	2013-03-03	617	Mats Valk	Zonhoven Open 2013
5.66	2011-25-06		Feliks Zemdegs	Melbourne Winter Open 2011

7.03	2010-11-13	853	Feliks Zemdegs	Melbourne Cube Day 2010
7.08	2008-13-07		Erik Akkersdijk	Czech Open 2008

5.55	2013-03-03	841	Mats Valk	Zonhoven Open 2013
7.03	2010-11-13		Feliks Zemdegs	Melbourne Cube Day 2010
 
Back
Top