[2x2x2] The Road to a Sub-3 Average (Help)

[TheCuberboy1996]

http://worldcubeassociation.org/results/p.php?i=2008KACZ01

For a good year now, I've been trying to get a sub-3 average in 2x2x2. My PB is 1.09, which brought me to be 12th best in the world. I mainly used CLL, but I use Ortega on rare occasion. My average is 3.49, which I hope to improve. My latest (out of competition) average was a 3.31. I guess I'm hoping for a sub-1 single as well, but I'm mainly shooting for a sub-3 average. I'd be pretty interested on what you guys think about this goal, and hearing your experiences with similar 2x2x2 averages.

 

[Tim Major]

I opened this thread expecting a tutorial of sorts >_>

 

[TheCuberboy1996]

I opened this thread expecting a tutorial of sorts >_>

...that would be in the How-to section of the forums.

 

[Tim Major]

...that would be in the How-to section of the forums.

I apologize for coming here from the homepage.
Anyway here;
1. Be colour neutral.
2. Use as much inspection as you want, until you can predict the CLL. Practise this.
3. Do a tonne of solves.
TPS+1look=sub 3
Also check how efficient your layer is, compare to the average optimal.

 

[TheCuberboy1996]

I apologize for coming here from the homepage.
Anyway here;
1. Be colour neutral.
2. Use as much inspection as you want, until you can predict the CLL. Practise this.
3. Do a tonne of solves.
TPS+1look=sub 3
Also check how efficient your layer is, compare to the average optimal.

Sorry about that first part...and thanks for the tips. I appreciate it.

 

[Zarxrax]

Also try learning EG-1

 

[NSKuber]

Yes, if you want to have sub-3 and to 1-look - you REALLY need to learn EG-1.
nskuber-en.ucoz.ru

 

[emolover]

You could learn this method instead of EG.

http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?35203-OSPA(New-2x2-Method)

It could be easily Sub 3.

 

[NSKuber]

You could learn this method instead of EG.

http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?35203-OSPA(New-2x2-Method)

It could be easily Sub 3.

Any proofs of that this can be sub-3 except just theory?

 

[Ickenicke]

Any proofs of that this can be sub-3 except just theory?

I have tried out some algs and started learning some algs, and I promise that is absolutely can be sub 3. If you just get used to the recognition it will be pretty easy, beacuse the algs are pretty nice.

 

[Zarxrax]

Well if he's already learned CLL at this point, I really doubt he wants to just throw it away and start over with something else.

 

[emolover]

Any proofs of that this can be sub-3 except just theory?

I have some sub 2 solves with it.

 

[Forte]

I have some sub 2 solves with it.

Not to be a ******bag or anything, but this doesn't really prove anything lol

 

[NSKuber]

Not to be a ******bag or anything, but this doesn't really prove anything lol

This. If you'll have at least sub-3.5 Ao100 - then I'll believe this method is really fast
Anyway, good luck progressing at your method.
I'll stay with EG forever