kcl
Legend
CLL Sune Set Executed in 4.06
Oh I see. I might be able to sub 2 it.
Ok 2.09 first try
Oh I see. I might be able to sub 2 it.
Ok 2.09 first try
2x2 CLL Set Relays
- Thread starter Rubiks560
- Start date
Rubiks560
Nub
I'll try when I'm fine. This should be easy
Coolster01
Veteran
Couldn't 1.795 because my Y is so slow (barely sub 1, my slowest cll)
kcl
Legend
CLL Sune Set Executed in 4.06
I realized AUF isn't part of a J perm, and I fixed my Y perm so it's sub 1. Just got 1.86..
I realized AUF isn't part of a J perm, and I fixed my Y perm so it's sub 1. Just got 1.86..
Last edited:
Rubiks560
Nub
1.61.
edit 1.55
edit 1.55
Last edited:
Tim Major
Platinum Member
kcl
Legend
Ooh I'm actually gonna try that.. Thanks!
Rubiks560
Nub
My algs:
R' U R' F2 R F' R' F2 R2 J perm
R' U R' F2 R F' U R' F2 R F' R y perm.
R' U R' F2 R F' R' F2 R2 J perm
R' U R' F2 R F' U R' F2 R F' R y perm.
kcl
Legend
wat I found that Y perm today after realizing I could sub .6 that Ortega alg
Coolster01
Veteran
OK, so me and Lucas were seeing how fast we could do each sune alg individually and add them up (not in a row, just fastest times ever with each alg). These were my times:
Sune - .30
F R' F' - .48
R' F2 - .54
Niklas - .34
diagsune - .49
Ugly - .69
= 2.84 So sub-3 is potential o_O
Sune - .30
F R' F' - .48
R' F2 - .54
Niklas - .34
diagsune - .49
Ugly - .69
= 2.84 So sub-3 is potential o_O
kcl
Legend
CLL Sune Set Executed in 4.06
Lol at how I know exactly what you mean by "Ugly" XD
I think everyone hates that one.
I still can't sub 4
4.03 is my best...
Lol at how I know exactly what you mean by "Ugly" XD
I think everyone hates that one.
I still can't sub 4
4.03 is my best...
Last edited:
Coolster01
Veteran
Haha ikr. This thread i getting bumped so often xD The title should be changed to "2x2 Sune Set" or something
kcl
Legend
Haha ikr. This thread i getting bumped so often xD The title should be changed to "2x2 Sune Set" or something
Ooh it should. I'll flag it for the mods..
Edit: flagged for title change
Also, if sub 3 is actually possible,
inb4sub3 somehow
I predicted dat
Last edited:
Rubiks560
Nub
You need to add a bit to each of those. Timing with a stackmat really isn't very accurate.
kcl
Legend
Rubiks560
Nub
The way I do it is
Why not just use frame by frame? That's only way to know how fast it really is.
kcl
Legend
Coolster01
Veteran
Yeah, I know it probably would've been like .05 slower for each one, but that still makes a 3.1x and I was just saying that we have a lot of potential (well, not really we for that matter because those four hours were the worst of my life).
EDIT: Well, I was also saying sub3 was possible too, to be fair not for me I guess.
EDIT: Well, I was also saying sub3 was possible too, to be fair
not for me I guess.
Last edited:
Bhargav777
OH friendly please
I just read this whole thread and I don't feel like living on this planet anymore .-.
kcl
Legend
Ok so I'm going to drill each CLL Set like this. And then do one giant CLL Time attack. I bet Chris could do it sub 30.
