2009 Forum Awards!

Edward you have 19 posts in the last 24 hours and 18 in the 24 hours before that. Your real PPD is NOT going down. All you're doing is moving your posts to forums where they are not counted so that the number on your profile goes down.
 
Best Post (overall) = Qq's Poetry

Funniest Post = Shoot's 'Terrible News'

Worst Post = Imaghost

Best Arguing = Stefan Pochmann (in general)

Worst Arguing = Mine (Weird PLL Skip thread)

Best Member (overall) = Chris Hardwick

Most Intelligent Member = A difficult one, probably qq.

Meanest Member = Stefan Pochmann

Nicest Member = Mike Hughey

Most Helpful Member = Stefan Pochmann

Least Helpful Member = Alex Yu (anyone remember freestyle = 3 cycle?) :P

Funniest Member = Ethan Rosen

Most Clueless Member = ZB FTW

Best Moderator = DavidWoner

Worst Moderator = Brunson

Worst Troll= TurbulentTurtle

Biggest Postwhore = Byu

Most Insane Member = Guimond

Worst Grammar = Alex Yu (Yoruichi)

Most Improved Noob = Chris Bird

Most Worsened Noob = ZB FTW

Most Deserved Ban = Pentrixter

Most Deserving of a (perma)Ban = Danielex0328947239477189334589

Most Gender-Confused = Deney baby

Best Avatar = David Woner

Worst Avatar = Mine

Biggest Fanboy (doesn't matter whom they are a fan of) = Me for Breandan Vallance, lol.

Best Thread Title= "A miracle Generic 5x5x5 parity algorithm?"

cba to find any others right now.
 
Worst Arguing all potheads are morons

Meanest Moderator Dan Cohen

Nicest Member IamWEB

Best Moderator cmhardw

Most Worsened Noob mee!

Best Signature chopper FTW

Best Avatar Avatar

Biggest Fanboy (doesn't matter whom they are a fan of) Mee! for knockoffs

Best Thread Title how to stop the pooping of rubik's DIY

Worst Thread Title how to stop the pooping of rubik's DIY
 
Last edited:
You wouldn't give a paraplegic kid the award for 'Worst Runner' in a school, would you? Even if the award itself was just a bit of a joke?
I might.

And why would you do that?

Why would the paraplegic run in the first place, thus setting himself up to get the award.

NOTE: I don't want to actually join this stupid argument, I just feel like stirring it up some. JOIN THE OPPOSITION.
 
You wouldn't give a paraplegic kid the award for 'Worst Runner' in a school, would you? Even if the award itself was just a bit of a joke?
I might.

And why would you do that?

Why would the paraplegic run in the first place, thus setting himself up to get the award.

NOTE: I don't want to actually join this stupid argument, I just feel like stirring it up some. JOIN THE OPPOSITION.

If you're going to say that, then surely

"Why would the paraplegic go a school where everybody could run, thus setting himself up to get the award?"

would make more sense?
You don't have to engage in an event (or even be able to) to be the 'worst' at it.
 
Sure, but then again, you wouldn't see the best actress in the world ever winning a grammy (or is it an emmy? I don't really know or care). You would only see who was the best in this particular year, in a western country, who actually bothered to show themselves.

My point being, to be in the run for an award, you have to put yourself in the running (no pun intended). If the paraplegic didn't run, he wouldn't be in the running for the award (sorry about the run/running thing, again). shoot posts here, he even posted about his grammar, therefore he puts himself in the running.
 
Back
Top