• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

2 holes example solves

V Achyuthan

Veteran
Joined
Nov 29, 2020
Messages
452
Location
India
WCA
2022SUND04
YouTube
Visit Channel
U' L2 F2 D' U2 L2 F2 D B2 U' F2 R2 B' D2 R D' L D' U' F' L2 R
y2 // inspection
D R' F D y' // 222
U' F2 U2 R // BR pair
U' S' U L' U L // FL pair
S U R U R' // FR pair
S' U' S // solve one more cross edge
U' R' U' F2 R F2 R' F' U R U' F' // 2 holes CLL (not all algs generated yet)
U' M U2 M' U' M' U2 M' U M2 U // L5EP
45 STM

you can generate algs for 2 holes CLL using cube explorer
Next : L B U' R' L2 F D2 L D F2 L' U2 R D2 R U2 D2 R2 U2 L' U2
 
It's basically a FreeFOP approach to MI that V Achyuthan (formally Xtowncuber2007) claims to have invented.
First, it is Xtremecuber2007 (Drew Brad's yt channel name is Xtowncuber bruh)
Second, not claimed. I did invent it.
Third, I don't want to start an argument.
Fourth and Final, If anybody wanna help me generate 2 holes CLL algs pm me.
Thank you
 
Next : L B U' R' L2 F D2 L D F2 L' U2 R D2 R U2 D2 R2 U2 L' U2
x2 // inspection
R2 L' U2 F' U F D y' R U R // 222 + BL pair
F' U' L' U L // FL pair + one more cross edge
S U' S' U R U' S' // Last pair
y' R2 D R' U2 R D' R' U2 R' // COLL
U2 M U' M2 U2 M2 U' M' U'// L5EP
40 STM

Next : F2 R2 D B2 D2 F2 D' L2 B2 U2 L2 U' L' B D2 L D' F' L' U' B R'
 
It's basically a FreeFOP approach to MI that V Achyuthan (formally Xtowncuber2007) claims to have invented.
Also just because MI1 and 2 holes have similarities doesn't mean they are same methods.
If you can compare MI1 and 2 holes maybe you can compare ZZ (EO cross) and CFOP as well. They have only one main difference. Doing EO before starting.

if you did invent it why the name is not Xtremecuber2007 method?
seems fishy to me
Bruh. Because I didn't want to name a method after myself. Also my name is V Achyuthan. And as I told I don't wanna start an argument.
Why is CFOP not called the Jessica Fridrich method?
Good point.
 
Next : L B U' R' L2 F D2 L D F2 L' U2 R D2 R U2 D2 R2 U2 L' U2
ZBLL variant:
z y // Inspection
u2 B F2 L F2 R' U' R2 U R2 L2 F2 L' // 222 + Setup for easy pairs [13/13]
U' R2 U2 R' // Multislot +1 [4/17]
U' F' r U r' // LS + EO [5/22]
U' F U R U' R' U R U2 R' U' R U R' F' // ZBLL [15/37]
37 STM

Kind of debatable whether this is "2-Hole" but I would still count it


Next: U2 L2 F2 R2 U F2 U B2 L2 F2 D' L2 R' D B' D' U' L F' U2 B2 D
 
Next: U2 L2 F2 R2 U F2 U B2 L2 F2 D' L2 R' D B' D' U' L F' U2 B2 D
z2 // inspection
U2 R2 U' L' // 222
U R F U' R // BR pair
U2 R' F R // FL pair
R U' R' // FR pair
U' M' U' M // 1 more cross edge
y F' L' U' L U L' U' L U F' // 2 holes CLL
U M U2 M' U' M2 U' M U2 M U' // L5EP
41 STM

Next : L2 B2 D L2 U' R2 U B2 U2 F2 U2 L' U F R2 U2 F2 L2 R' F U'

ZBLL variant:
z y // Inspection
u2 B F2 L F2 R' U' R2 U R2 L2 F2 L' // 222 + Setup for easy pairs [13/13]
U' R2 U2 R' // Multislot +1 [4/17]
U' F' r U r' // LS + EO [5/22]
U' F U R U' R' U R U2 R' U' R U R' F' // ZBLL [15/37]
37 STM

Kind of debatable whether this is "2-Hole" but I would still count it
Sorry but this is not 2 holes. It is just "more like" CFOP.
 
Why is CFOP not called the Jessica Fridrich method?
It is actually sometimes referred to as the Fridrich method. I personally prefer this but not many people do so I just say CFOP for easier understanding

haha. That is not the answer buddy. 2 holes CLL algs solve EO and CLL at the same time. Maybe you should read about a method thoroughly first and then ask questions or make conclusions about it.
That's not the greatest alg set. Let me clarify. It is a good trick set for if you stumble upon a good case but this is still NCLL and this already exists. Perfect example of "Do what I say not as I do" because you clearly don't know much about the NCLL extensions. On top of that it would be better, most of the time, to do NCLL + L5E due to better algs and recognition.

First, it is Xtremecuber2007 (Drew Brad's yt channel name is Xtowncuber bruh)
Second, not claimed. I did invent it.
Third, I don't want to start an argument.
Fourth and Final, If anybody wanna help me generate 2 holes CLL algs pm me.
Thank you
1. My bad I thought you used Drew's username and claimed as your own among other things. ;)

2. I'm pretty sure many people have thought of this before you (myself included) but did not pursue it do to being inferior. Is it viable? Yes but that doesn't mean it offers any advantages over the more viable methods (ZZ-CT for example has the advantage of less algs compared to other
1LLSLL/1LLL methods).

3. You're right and it's probably best not to get into a debate with someone who isn't willing to defend there ground. : )

Also just because MI1 and 2 holes have similarities doesn't mean they are same methods.
If you can compare MI1 and 2 holes maybe you can compare ZZ (EO cross) and CFOP as well. They have only one main difference. Doing EO before starting.
You can very well compare the ZZ and CFOP and that has been debated plenty of times before. The difference is the both sides had their rights and wrongs and gave good arguments.

Edit:
Sorry but this is not 2 holes. It is just "more like" CFOP

I think you mean FreeFOP. If you're doing a partial cross method you're bound to "accidently" put in the "right" piece. This is like calling the 3x3 WR a Petrus solve. It's merely a coincidence. I also find this post extremely ironic lol.

You're just jealous I had a lower movecount
 
Last edited:
Next : L2 B2 D L2 U' R2 U B2 U2 F2 U2 L' U F R2 U2 F2 L2 R' F U'
y' U' F' R' F // 222
L U L' U' L U2 L' // BL pair
y U F' R U R' // FR pair
M' U' M U y L U2 L' U' L U L' // BL pair
U2 F R U' R2 D' F2 D R F' U // 2 holes CLL
M U' M2 U2 M2 U' M' // L5EP
45 STM

Next : B2 L2 D' R2 U' F2 U F2 U2 F2 D2 L' U' B' L U2 L' D F R U'

3. You're right and it's probably best not to get into a debate with someone who isn't willing to defend there ground. : )
Bad joke buddy. I can defend my grounds. But I have gotten into a lot of fights before and I am not willing to start another one again. If you don't want to accept 2 holes as a new method then don't.

You're just jealous I had a lower movecount
Too funny dude. Because I have got a 31 move solve before.

Next : B2 L2 D' R2 U' F2 U F2 U2 F2 D2 L' U' B' L U2 L' D F R U'
x' // inspection
y' U F L F' B R2 R' U R u y// 222 and FL pair
U R U2 R2 U' R S' U' S // BR pair + one cross edge
R U R' U F' U' F // FR pair
F' L' U L S' U L' U' L f // 2 holes CLL
U M2 U' M2 U' M U2 M' U' // L5EP
45 STM

Next : B2 L' F2 L F' U2 D L' D F2 R2 B2 U2 B2 U F2 L2 U2 D' L2

Next : B2 L' F2 L F' U2 D L' D F2 R2 B2 U2 B2 U F2 L2 U2 D' L2
y' // inspection
U' L' F' R' F' D' // 222
y R' D2 U' R' U R D' U R' U' R U2 S' U2 S D' // FL + FR pair +1 cross edge
U' R' U R // BR pair
y U' R2 F2 R F' L' U2 L2 F L' U2 R // 2 holes CLL
U2 M U2 M' U M2 U M U2 M // L5EP
48 STM

Next : L2 B2 D' B2 R2 U R2 D B2 F2 R2 B' R D2 B' L' B' D' R U2 L'

Next : L2 B2 D' B2 R2 U R2 D B2 F2 R2 B' R D2 B' L' B' D' R U2 L'
z2 // inspection
F2 L' U' R B' D2 // 222
y U R2 F // FL pair
R U R' // FR pair
M' U' L' B l // BR pair + oone cross edge
y F' U' R F U2 F' R' F U' F' U2 F // 2 holes CLL
M U2 M' U M' U2 M' U' M2 // L5EP
38 STM

Next : L2 U2 B2 R2 L B U2 R' B' R2 D L2 F2 L2 U2 F2 U' R2 U R2 F2

Next : L2 U2 B2 R2 L B U2 R' B' R2 D L2 F2 L2 U2 F2 U' R2 U R2 F2
y2 // inspection
S' L f // 222
R' U R U2 F' R // FL pair + BR pair
U' R U R2 F R f' U2 S // FR pair + 1 more cross edge
U R2 U F R' F2 R F' U' F2 R2 U // 2 holes CLL
M2 U M' U2 M U M2 // L3E / EPLL
37 STM

Next : F' U' F B' R U' L B2 D L F2 B2 D2 F2 L B2 R' U2 F2 R'

Next : F' U' F B' R U' L B2 D L F2 B2 D2 F2 L B2 R' U2 F2 R'
U L B2 R' D2 // 222
y U' R2 U' R // BR pair
S' U' L' U' L S // FL pair
F' L F' L' F2 U S' U S // FR pair + one cross edge
R U' L2 B2 R2 D' R F2 R B2 R' F2 L2 // finish
37 STM

Next : B2 F2 R' B2 L' F2 L2 U2 L F2 R' U' B' D F U F' U2 F2 D2
 
Next : B2 F2 R' B2 L' F2 L2 U2 L F2 R' U' B' D F U F' U2 F2 D2
z2 y // inspection
D R' U F U2 R2 // 222
L' U2 L U L' U' L U' F' U' F // FL and FR pair
M' U' l U' L' U L U L' // one cross edge + BL pair
y' U R' F' R F' U' F U F // 2 holes CLL
M U2 M' U' M2 U' M2 U' // L5EP
43 STM

Next : B L2 B' L2 F' U2 B L2 F U2 R2 F U' B' L2 R' B' D2 F' D' F'
 
Second, not claimed. I did invent it.
Third, I don't want to start an argument.
Not to be ongry, right, but if you go into the new Method Thread, you can literally find this exact method every 8 pages or so.
It's not explicitly on the wiki since pretty much everyone drops this idea before going further with it.
And I DID tell you the above, plus the downsides before.
 
I don't know which was the last scramble I posted so I took a random scramble from CStimer
U2 D' L F L B R D L' D2 R2 F2 U2 R2 D F2 B2 L2 U2 B2 U2
z y2 F u U B // FS
R U2 R' r' U r2 U2 R // SS
L' U L F U F // FR pair + DF edge
L' U L // FL pair
f U f' R' f R U' R' f' R // OLLCP
R U R' U R' U' R' U' R2 U2 R // RL5EP
42 STM
40 STM with cancellations
 
Back
Top