ProStar
Legend
But usually it can't even get sub-25.
Enter the setup scramble
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But usually it can't even get sub-25.
Ohhh now I get what you mean.Enter the setup scramble
Why in the world are you not counting a lucky solve? the WR solve was lucky x10 but THEY still counted it. when people say that they don't count lucky PBs it makes no sense.I got four free pairs in a 5.88 which is exactly why im not counting it. i have evidence as well, i was doing comp sim with friends. (not this scramble btw)
Not counting a solve as your PB is almost a dead giveaway that its a fake scramble/solve. If you get a good time why wouldn't it be counted as your PB? That is unless you did not want it to since its fake.Why in the world are you not counting a lucky solve? the WR solve was lucky x10 but THEY still counted it. when people say that they don't count lucky PBs it makes no sense.
rip prostar 2020For everyone accusing this solve as fake(and any fast solve for that matter), I have a question to ask you: If Feliks Zemdegs had made this post, saying he got a 2.64 on a 21 move solve, planned 3 pairs, did a recon, etc.; would you accuse him of being fake or would you be really congratulatory and happy and ecstatic?
What I'm trying to say is that we don't have any evidence that he faked it, and we should believe him unless proof appears disproving him. Just because it's not Feliks or Max doesn't mean it has to be fake. People are reacting the same way they did to Yusheng's record: "Not feliks or max? FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
yeah but i hated it because i avged 17 and my pb was 5.88 and no one believed me so i just stopped counting itWhy in the world are you not counting a lucky solve? the WR solve was lucky x10 but THEY still counted it. when people say that they don't count lucky PBs it makes no sense.
But you GOT it right? That's like saying "Oh well I juggled like 15 balls but i can only usually juggle like 8 balls so I think i'll just pretend that my monumental accomplishent didn't ever happen"yeah but i hated it because i avged 17 and my pb was 5.88 and no one believed me so i just stopped counting it
I am trying to find it, I did a post on it on the accomplishment thread a while back on my old computerBut you GOT it right? That's like saying "Oh well I juggled like 15 balls but i can only usually juggle like 8 balls so I think i'll just pretend that my monumental accomplishent didn't ever happen"
If you had a recon then why didn't people believe you? Maybe you DID fake it IDK
Preach!For everyone accusing this solve as fake(and any fast solve for that matter), I have a question to ask you: If Feliks Zemdegs had made this post, saying he got a 2.64 on a 21 move solve, planned 3 pairs, did a recon, etc.; would you accuse him of being fake or would you be really congratulatory and happy and ecstatic?
What I'm trying to say is that we don't have any evidence that he faked it, and we should believe him unless proof appears disproving him. Just because it's not Feliks or Max doesn't mean it has to be fake. People are reacting the same way they did to Yusheng's record: "Not feliks or max? FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
can I mention that this scramble has 2 F2's in a row. That is a big giveaway that the scramble was inputted (or inputted by you or him to try to prove it was from cstimer) because whoever did input it messed it up
no its been cropped wrong, no idea whycan I mention that this scramble has 2 F2's in a row. That is a big giveaway that the scramble was inputted (or inputted by you or him to try to prove it was from cstimer) because whoever did input it messed it up
sure......no its been cropped wrong, no idea why
and feliks or max got this scramble, i dont think anyone would be going up to him and saying, totally legit, or stop faking solves.