2.64 Single (Jackmennie_23 on IG)

I got four free pairs in a 5.88 which is exactly why im not counting it. i have evidence as well, i was doing comp sim with friends. (not this scramble btw)
Why in the world are you not counting a lucky solve? the WR solve was lucky x10 but THEY still counted it. when people say that they don't count lucky PBs it makes no sense.
 
Why in the world are you not counting a lucky solve? the WR solve was lucky x10 but THEY still counted it. when people say that they don't count lucky PBs it makes no sense.
Not counting a solve as your PB is almost a dead giveaway that its a fake scramble/solve. If you get a good time why wouldn't it be counted as your PB? That is unless you did not want it to since its fake.
 
For everyone accusing this solve as fake(and any fast solve for that matter), I have a question to ask you: If Feliks Zemdegs had made this post, saying he got a 2.64 on a 21 move solve, planned 3 pairs, did a recon, etc.; would you accuse him of being fake or would you be really congratulatory and happy and ecstatic?

What I'm trying to say is that we don't have any evidence that he faked it, and we should believe him unless proof appears disproving him. Just because it's not Feliks or Max doesn't mean it has to be fake. People are reacting the same way they did to Yusheng's record: "Not feliks or max? FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
rip prostar 2020
 
yeah but i hated it because i avged 17 and my pb was 5.88 and no one believed me so i just stopped counting it
But you GOT it right? That's like saying "Oh well I juggled like 15 balls but i can only usually juggle like 8 balls so I think i'll just pretend that my monumental accomplishent didn't ever happen"

If you had a recon then why didn't people believe you? Maybe you DID fake it IDK
 
But you GOT it right? That's like saying "Oh well I juggled like 15 balls but i can only usually juggle like 8 balls so I think i'll just pretend that my monumental accomplishent didn't ever happen"

If you had a recon then why didn't people believe you? Maybe you DID fake it IDK
I am trying to find it, I did a post on it on the accomplishment thread a while back on my old computer
 
For everyone accusing this solve as fake(and any fast solve for that matter), I have a question to ask you: If Feliks Zemdegs had made this post, saying he got a 2.64 on a 21 move solve, planned 3 pairs, did a recon, etc.; would you accuse him of being fake or would you be really congratulatory and happy and ecstatic?

What I'm trying to say is that we don't have any evidence that he faked it, and we should believe him unless proof appears disproving him. Just because it's not Feliks or Max doesn't mean it has to be fake. People are reacting the same way they did to Yusheng's record: "Not feliks or max? FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Preach!
 
it must suck to get a pb like that, ure not beating it in a long long time
maybe im too sensitive with the whole hey you dont break the quaranteen balcony (didn't happen to me but it triggers me anyway) thing but you guys xddd what triggers me the most is that you don't want the turth to prevail or anything you just want to be the hero that exposes someone out
actually thats the only thing that triggers me. if you think he is cheating and say i think he is cheating im ok wit htaht but ure not doing that, nor telling someone to investigate, nor invastigating yourself. its just spitting poison. and i love it
personally if he is just someone looking for attention i would endulge him, im not his father. im not impressed enough to care, just an anecdote, a cool moment. woudlve been cool to see it

also i see the irony of me exposing you for trying to expose someone but i justify it saying that im aware of it. I too have a cop complex

also that was my last post in this forum i dont feel like reading the replies
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, this solve wasnt done by me, and i dont have a personal opinion on whether this is fake or real. My friend just sent me an easy scramble. Im just saying, if this solve was genned on cstimer (unlikely but their is a chance), and feliks or max got this scramble, i dont think anyone would be going up to him and saying, totally legit, or stop faking solves.
 
If you assume this is fake the solution is such an obvious one to choose. The F2L is basically as short as you can get with 4 pairs and a LL skip. It is possible this is a real scramble but faking a scramble with a dream solution seems more likely.
 
and feliks or max got this scramble, i dont think anyone would be going up to him and saying, totally legit, or stop faking solves.

If Feliks(or Max, or Jay, or whatever) claimed a 2.64, had no video, had this scramble(which we've already discussed is suspicious), wasn't counting it as his PB or WB, and had it posted by his friend instead of himself, then yeah. I'd call him out.
 
Back
Top