Tim Major
Platinum Member
And what use would that be?If you logo is on red-yellow-blue tip then you can quickly determine where will be green face (opposite to the tip with logo).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what use would that be?If you logo is on red-yellow-blue tip then you can quickly determine where will be green face (opposite to the tip with logo).
And what use would that be?
Sure, you could theoretically do this, but instead of steps 3 and 4 all you have to do is continue to count until you have your 3rd center solved (which should be like <5 extra slice turns). And then instead of doing (rU2)5 you can just do an extra slice turn right before you solve that 3rd center. I've done this before for fun - without the wing tracing of course - so I can tell you that having a logo on a center piece wouldn't really provide any advantage. It's just one extra (inefficient) way to keep track of slice moves.Ok, here is the perfect plan (for 4x4):
1) During inspection "memorize" wings like in bld, counting number of cycles, thus counting if there is parity or not.
2) Solve two opposite centers, one of them must have a logo. Count the number of slices you did. Thus you know if there is parity after two centers.
3) Put your solved centers on right and left sides. Note where is your logo. Solve other centers using <Rw, U, 3Lw>. Try to count Rw moves.
4) Oh man, you didn't count Rw moves! Worry not! You just need to see where is your logo now. You still know whether you have parity![...].
Hang on. You now have to insert your edges entirely without affecting the U center - that means no RUR' type inserts (unless you finish with a U') and no U turns to move stuff into position (again, unless you undo it afterwards). So this isn't even a situation where you can replace your center checking with an easier method - you literally have to waste moves for this to work. Clearly not worth it.Another "cheat" with logos on 5x5x5 (in the center):
Suppose I solve 5x5 using freeslice. I solved all centers and start freeslice between white and yellow sides (the logo is on the white side). I note how the logo is rotated. Now I solved 8 edges and need to restore centers (using Uw and Dw). Unfortunately, I can determine the slice needed very slowly. But I just need to look at the rotation of the logo again - and I know how many Uw I need to do to restore centers. Well, I still need to determine Dw slice, but the logo speeds me up.
Hang on. You now have to insert your edges entirely without affecting the U center - that means no RUR' type inserts (unless you finish with a U') and no U turns to move stuff into position (again, unless you undo it afterwards). So this isn't even a situation where you can replace your center checking with an easier method - you literally have to waste moves for this to work. Clearly not worth it.
Also, that would automatically make the new fangshi 2x2 illegal with no good way of making it legal since there is currently no good way of getting extra tiles
Just saying that even right now after reading most of this thread I still don't know on which corner piece of my 2x2 my logo is.
Just saying that even right now after reading most of this thread I still don't know on which corner piece of my 2x2 my logo is.
1) Logos are still allowed on the following puzzles: 3x3x3/5x5x5/7x7x7, Skewb, Megaminx, Square-1
What exactly are you trying to say with this? That it cannot be used to discern which corner it is from looking at one sticker?
No. I'm try to say that people don't usually try to cheat by using the logo. Myself for instance.
Most people don't try to cheat at all. So should we not bother with regulations to prevent cheating then?
I never said that.
No. I'm try to say that people don't usually try to cheat by using the logo. Myself for instance.
None of the fast blindcubers have any benefit to peeking under the blindfold. I would never do something like that, and I don't think we need to distrust competitors about it.
- Everyone, before February 2008