2GLL algorithms

[Spitfire97]

Where can I find 2-gen 2GLL algorithms other than lars's page??
some of lars's algorithms are 4 gen:confused:??

 

[Edward]

http://loftycuber.webs.com/pll.htm

Alot are 2gen, but some are 3 and 4gen. Its impossible to do everything 2gen.

 

[Spitfire97]

http://loftycuber.webs.com/pll.htm

Alot are 2gen, but some are 3 and 4gen. Its impossible to do everything 2gen.

IT IS POSSIBLE!
Corners have been permuted already and why does that link say PLL?

 

[Escher]

You can find some here spitfire:
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16047

Though that list misses out some cases (the recognition isn't in regard the corners, so sometimes you will end up with a H (X) Perm).
If I understand you correctly, you are trying to learn a subset of ZBLL?
You can find ZBLL algs on Jason Baum's page, and on Chris Hardwicks speedcubing.com page.
Or you can find ZZLL algorithms here:
http://www.emsee.110mb.com/Speedcubing/ZZLL/

I'm not sure whether I am answering your question correctly though.

If you are actually looking for <R, U> Generator PLLs, it's impossible. Only Edge Permutation cases can be solved using <R, U> generator.

You might find some nice PLLs here though, if you are looking for algorithms within <R, U, D> or <R, U, F>:
http://www.opticubes.com/cubing/pll/

 

[Edward]

http://loftycuber.webs.com/
mmy bad
What I meant was, every last layer case cant be solved using only 1 2gen alg.

 

[Spitfire97]

I had a feeling Id get responses like this.
2GLL is when corners have already been permuted so you permute edges and twist corners.
Ill take a look at that list Rowan.
Yes A subset of ZBLL and jason only has up his T set so Ill learn those
At least the 2GLL ones

 

[Edward]

You could use cube explorer and create your own.

 

[4Chan]

I have all of the algs.

It would be a pain to type and I wouldn't get anything in return, so I don't feel like sharing them. =/


You can find all of them on bernard helmstetters list.
You can find T set on baums site, U set on hardwicks page, and L set on dan harris' OLD page.

 

[Spitfire97]

Are yours 2 Gen??
I can deal with 3 gen but 4 gen Is just unacceptable

 

[irontwig]

Are yours 2 Gen??
I can deal with 3 gen but 4 gen Is just unacceptable

What's so unacceptable about 4 gen? As long as my fingers like an alg I don't care how many faces I turn.

 

[DavidWoner]

http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

 

[Spitfire97]

Are yours 2 Gen??
I can deal with 3 gen but 4 gen Is just unacceptable

What's so unacceptable about 4 gen? As long as my fingers like an alg I don't care how many faces I turn.

Because Its 2GLL 2G stands for 2 gen.
why should I turn 4 faces if I only have to turn 2 just some extra moves?
Im sure Chris can sub 3 all his since they all seem pretty fast.
4 gen algs just dont work for me(my V perm is 4 gen and my best execution for it is 2.99)

 

[4Chan]

Optimal AND 2-gen.

But like I said, It's a lot of work to share, and Bernard Helmstetter's list is also optimal and 2-gen.

EDIT: I should explain why I made my own list if one already exists.
Bernard Helmstetter's list recognizes from different angles than I'm used to, also, the list is long and confusing to read. I don't understand how he ordered the algorithms, and it's just too much work for me. I also don't like some of the algorithms, even though he lists 3+ for each case. The font isn't also that friendly either.

If you need an optimal+2gen list of 2GLL, thats your best option, after the other ones I've noted.

 

[Egide]

Here's a compilation of the 2GLL algorithms l use, if you have better algs please share

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfybq5rYvME

 

[TDM]

Here's a compilation of the 2GLL algorithms l use, if you have better algs please share

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfybq5rYvME

Really useful video. Just two things: Firstly, at 0:53, [y2] R U2 R' U' R U R' U' R U' R' (double antisune) is probably better. Also, you've repeated some of the H set because four of them (U perms) are just rotations of the other four.

 

[Robert-Y]

Really useful video. Just two things: Firstly, at 0:53, [y2] R U2 R' U' R U R' U' R U' R' (double antisune) is probably better. Also, you've repeated some of the H set because four of them (U perms) are just rotations of the other four.

They are still cases which you need to deal with...

I think most recognise the OCLL first, (then AUF), then deduce what ZBLL case they have. For H cases, it's difficult to tell what case you have immediately and it's a bit annoying to have to do U2 or y2 before you do the algorithm. That's mainly why I use a mixture of <RU> and <LU> algs for that COLL subset of ZBLL.

 

[A Leman]

Here's a compilation of the 2GLL algorithms l use, if you have better algs please share

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfybq5rYvME

in the pi set f RUR'U' f' F RUR'U' F' is better than the 2gen for the case

 

[TDM]

They are still cases which you need to deal with...

I think most recognise the OCLL first, (then AUF), then deduce what ZBLL case they have. For H cases, it's difficult to tell what case you have immediately and it's a bit annoying to have to do U2 or y2 before you do the algorithm. That's mainly why I use a mixture of <RU> and <LU> algs for that COLL subset of ZBLL.

True. Personally, I'd prefer (and find it faster) to do a U2 than to do an <L,U> alg, but... different people prefer different things.

 

[Egide]

For the Pi case l use the 2gen alg because it flows smoothly (it's also OH friendly) and l tend to lock up with the other alg. the reason l don't do a U2 to get a previous alg especially for the H set is purely because l don't mind the <L,U> algorithms and also as Robert-Y said it tends to be a bit annoying.

 

[antoineccantin]

in the pi set f RUR'U' f' F RUR'U' F' is better than the 2gen for the case

I prefer R' U' R U' R' U2 R U R' U' R U' R' U2 R for OH AND 2H.