kcl
Member
Two of the three fastest Roux solvers are not y-neutral.
Also you speak like a moron.
Is Alex? I'm not arguing, just curious.
Two of the three fastest Roux solvers are not y-neutral.
Also you speak like a moron.
Is Alex? I'm not arguing, just curious.
Yes Alex is y axis neutral.
I am too, when I use Roux. I don't even notice.
I don't think many people will notice a difference for y axis, especially when they start solving that way when they're slower (standard for CN). The only difficulty for me was when I had yellow on bottom I was a tad slower but it was quick to get used to. I think it's largely because I almost never did yellow cross in CFOP solves. I didn't notice a difference for colour on the side though, although I think I should actively take note of it because when I do practice for just second block or CMLL, I think I'm quicker because I know before I start solving, not where pieces are, but what orientation I'm in and so what colours I'm looking for more than I do in speedsolves. Anyone else notice this as something they should/do/did work on?
You seem to slowly type like ben...Well, when I'm practicing SB, I get faster times cuz obv I haff more inspection/recog time. And as for color recog and orientation, it just seems to come naturally and I somehow am able to simulataneously pick up UL and UR edge color and other steps.
You seem to slowly type like ben...
Heh, I type like this for informal stuffs. I try not to be too hard to unnerstand. Et's sumthing my friends and I do
Heh, I type like this for informal stuffs. I try not to be too hard to unnerstand. Et's sumthing my friends and I do
Thom's point is that if you want to be taken seriously, talk properly. The fact that the medium is the internet doesn't excuse you to talk like Ben does. Which, quite frankly, makes me a bit ill.
Thom's point is that if you want to be taken seriously, talk properly. The fact that the medium is the internet doesn't excuse you to talk like Ben does. Which, quite frankly, makes me a bit ill.
Consider also that for the non english-speaking people is more difficult to understand if someone writes words in a wrong way.
V
Quick question:
What is the move breakdown for an average Roux solve?
Block 7-10 [7-10]
2nd block 15-20 [22-30]
CmLL 9 [31-39]
LSE 14-20 [45-59]
I'm trying different ways to break up Roux to see if any of them are faster/can be optimized. I'm just wondering if the figure of 48 moves on average is accurate. The only way I can see to improving on Roux is making it more alg-oriented instead of intuitive.
When I put the DR edge in and solve the block <RUM> I'm faster.
(...)
1. Is DR edge first -> inefficient 2nd block bad?
2. What's the best way to do L6E in general? (EO->UR UL->finish?)
3. Good splits to aim for to get sub 15.
That is because you are faster with CFOP, therefore CFOP-ish block building seems faster for you, even if it is less efficient. So yes, DR edge first is bad (most of the time). For example, in many cases it is easier to build the first corner-edge pair WITH the DR edge, and building the 1x2x2 with the remaining edge (FR or BR).
I'm just starting Roux, so can someone explain y color neutrality to me? It just means that you will solve your first block with either one color or it opposite on bottom, right? Like either yellow or white, or red or orange, etc.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | The "H" Method- A different Combination of Roux and CFOP | How-to's, Guides, etc. | 3 | |
CFOP vs ROUX | General Speedcubing Discussion | 12 | ||
[Member Intro] Yoooooooooooo I'm badatroux | Member Introductions | 8 | ||
G | I tried roux for 7 days | Puzzle Video Gallery | 0 | |
G | Trying roux for 7 days | Puzzle Theory | 2 |