I'll make a separate post, because I think this is important enough to warrant it...
Unlike Wikipedia, could we allow (semi-)original research to be posted, and have some format for it. Apart from general cubing knowledge, there are a lot of obscure things known by few cubers, and their sites are not nearly as easy to find for unknown info.
For example, I would like to post my OLL parity on the page about big even cube OLL parity, but it would be weird to say "Lucas Garron has found an alternate parity alg to the 'standard' one, which he and some people consider to be better. Among others, 4x4x4 and NAR holder Dan Cohen has adopted it." I'd like to be able to post something like "Lucas Garron: I found this parity alg using ACube, and I like it better than the standard one." and if people like the info, they can use it.
(That's one lovely thing about math, and some of cubing: If you write something, it's either true or not, and readers can decide whether they want to accept it.)
Okay, long example, but PJK, would you be for creating "Original Research" sections?
We'd still have to encourage good use, but I would find it a great tool for contribution.