Random Blindfold Cubing Discussion

Completed my list of speed-optimized 3-cycles for wings.

It is written with my lettering scheme so that I could show you my letter pair images and words used for memo. There is a breakdown of my lettering scheme on both pages and there are filters so you can look up algorithms regarding specific wings.

There is also a comments section - it will usually give advice on how to work out the advanced r2 algorithm, give an alternate alg or give you a better alg which I've only thought of after writing.

There are BOUND to be mistakes, although I have checked over already. Please point them out so I can correct it quickly.

LOL BJ. This is a masterpiece, bookmarked. Thanks for compiling this.

Edit: Is that possible to download so that we can change the lettering scheme to our own ones for easier reference?
 
Last edited:
LOL BJ. This is a masterpiece, bookmarked. Thanks for compiling this.

Edit: Is that possible to download so that we can change the lettering scheme to our own ones for easier reference?

I'm not sure. I "published" it on Google Documents which I'm not familiar with and it doesn't copy and paste well back into Excel. PM me your email and I'll send you a copy!

And thanks for the kind words!
 
Here are the maximum number of centres solved in 20,000 scrambles for 4bld:
Centres/Occurences/Percentage
<5 0 0.00%
5 22 0.11%
6 1565 7.83%
7 6173 30.87%
8 6671 33.36%
9 3596 17.98%
10 1396 6.98%
11 429 2.15%
12 117 0.59%
13 22 0.11%
14 8 0.04%
15 0 0.00%
16 0 0.00%
17 1 0.01%
>17 0 0.00%
 
Interesting.

Does the fact you calculate something for 4x4 bld mean that you are back to blinds? :)
No. I still enjoy talking and thinking about bigblds but am not tempted to solve.
I just enjoy excel a bit too much sometimes

EDIT: Interestingly, after my 4bld WR I said that it was a nice scramble, but maybe I would expect one that good in the 3 available scrambles at that comp. Indeed it had 9 centres solved and the probability of >=9 centres seems to be almost 30% so I was around the right area.
 
Last edited:
Debating doing a tutorial for a TuRBo edges method for a DF buffer. It's not a new idea, but I can't see any tutorials on YouTube and it may be useful for people who want to learn comms or even people wanting to learn to BLD from scratch.

DF -> UL -> UR - U M' U2 M U
DF -> UR -> UL - U' M' U2 M U'
DF -> LU -> RU - y' M D' M' [U2] M D M' [U2] y
DF -> RU -> LU - y' [U2] M D' M' [U2] M D M' y
DF -> UL -> RU - y U' L2 U [M'] U' L2 U [M] y'
DF -> RU -> UL - y [M'] U' L2 U [M] U' L2 U y'
DF -> LU -> UR - y' [M'] U R2 U' [M] U R2 U' y
DF -> UR -> LU - y' U R2 U' [M'] U R2 U' [M] y

Pros would be the low move counts for each alg, slightly more freedom with your set up moves because you can do U moves without moving your buffer piece around, and it's a start for people who want to learn about commutators because most of the algs are indeed comms. S'pose they'd be easy to learn too - just changing the position of the [interchange] gives the other alg.

Cons would be the U M' U2 M U not being center safe so it can't be used for midges (unless centers are solved first) and the rotations needed for the majority.
 
Debating doing a tutorial for a TuRBo edges method for a DF buffer. It's not a new idea, but I can't see any tutorials on YouTube and it may be useful for people who want to learn comms or even people wanting to learn to BLD from scratch.

ALGS ALGS ALGS

Pros would be the low move counts for each alg, slightly more freedom with your set up moves because you can do U moves without moving your buffer piece around, and it's a start for people who want to learn about commutators because most of the algs are indeed comms. S'pose they'd be easy to learn too - just changing the position of the [interchange] gives the other alg.

Cons would be the U M' U2 M U not being center safe so it can't be used for midges (unless centers are solved first) and the rotations needed for the majority.

I Found these at http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?2245-M2-vs-Free-Style-Edges/page2
I still using this algo

DF-UL-UR = U M’ U2 M U
DF-UR-UL = U’ M’ U2 M U’
DF-UL-RU = y U’ L2 U M’ U’ L2 U M y’
DF-RU-UL = y M’ U’ L2 U M U’ L2 U y’
DF-UR-LU = y’ U R2 U’ M’ U R2 U’ M y
DF-LU-UR = y’ M’ U R2 U’ M U R2 U’ y
DF-LU-RU = M U’ M U2 M’ U’ M’
DF-RU-LU = M U M U2 M’ U M’

I liked TuRBo but I also like the UF buffer. Another point is with the targets on 2 layers, you are forced to rotate instead of using an AUF. Good luck anyway. It could help people using M2
 
Wasn't sure where to post this:

I have just started learning old Pochmann method. I was practicing solving without memo to get used to the algs etc. However, I was deliberately not dealing with the parity problem. I got to a stage where I was completed except two corners were not orientated correctly.

I know this is probably explained in multiple places but how can everything be correct except two corners? I thought cycles on a cube were always in threes.
 
Wasn't sure where to post this:

I have just started learning old Pochmann method. I was practicing solving without memo to get used to the algs etc. However, I was deliberately not dealing with the parity problem. I got to a stage where I was completed except two corners were not orientated correctly.

I know this is probably explained in multiple places but how can everything be correct except two corners? I thought cycles on a cube were always in threes.

Misoriented pieces are not cycles. You can:
Flip an even number of edges
Twist 3 corners in the same direction
Twist 2 corners in opposite directions
 
Misoriented pieces are not cycles. You can:
Flip an even number of edges
Twist 3 corners in the same direction
Twist 2 corners in opposite directions

So is it possible to have any number of misoriented pieces? For example, would it be possible to have one misoriented piece?
 
I know no one in the world has tired this before but i want to try this and hoppefully i will be the first. I want to try every wca event blind in relay by before school starts back up in 2014 might be before that but this is a lot of work so im giving myself a lot of time, im not doing feet and fewest moves sorry :(. Im trying 6BLD next week, I know how to solve 7BLD I just haven't tired it. I only need to learn megaminx and square-1 which will be the hardest to learn. Then re-remember pyraminx and clock that will be easy and that's it. Its going to take me anywhere from 9-14 hours depending on how much improve by 2014 at blindsolving hopefully a lot more. If i try this is there anyone willing to try this too other then mike because i know he wants to try this but doesn't have the time. This is my overall cubing goal, Once i try this i want to move onto a minx relay maybe ;)
 
I know no one in the world has tired this before but i want to try this and hoppefully i will be the first. I want to try every wca event blind in relay by before school starts back up in 2014 might be before that but this is a lot of work so im giving myself a lot of time, im not doing feet and fewest moves sorry :(. Im trying 6BLD next week, I know how to solve 7BLD I just haven't tired it. I only need to learn megaminx and square-1 which will be the hardest to learn. Then re-remember pyraminx and clock that will be easy and that's it. Its going to take me anywhere from 9-14 hours depending on how much improve by 2014 at blindsolving hopefully a lot more. If i try this is there anyone willing to try this too other then mike because i know he wants to try this but doesn't have the time. This is my overall cubing goal, Once i try this i want to move onto a minx relay maybe ;)

This is the greatest thing ever. A lot of work though. I enjoy MultiBLD too much to bother with anything like that because time =P

If you're gonna do such a huge relay YOU MUST learn to solve with comms. With enough experience that relay should only take you around 3 hours. Are you still using U2/R2? Seriously. It will cut your solving time down dramatically. Plus it's awesome. I'll give you a breakdown of BH for corners and edges at the next meetup if you like.

Funny, I was thinking earlier today if I could be bothered doing 4BLD one handed. Has anyone ever tried blindsolving with feet?
 
Last edited:
Moops said:
Has anyone ever tried blindsolving with feet?

But yeah Bryson, comms would be a good idea. Centre comms are easy and they'll save you a bucketload of time for the bigcubes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hey...
i ve learned blindfold solving using pochmann method
in the part of memorising i ve some trouble
thats why i write the letters of memorisation on a paper and solve the cube by watching the paper..
am i going on the right way...or not..?
HELP...
 
Back
Top