Way to address the argument, and I joined earlier than you, by the way. I simply post less.
I have yet to see someone specifically turn himself or herself gay and back to show this to be true.
Agreed. However, this only addresses intolerance to a person, not his or her beliefs. This doesn't mean one can't compare two things. For instance, let's say there are two people: A and B. B has a problem x. A performs an action that shows of similar properites to x, but of a lesser extreme. Is it not correct to say in a hyperbolic way that A has problem x? Using this statement "A has x" is in no way a demeaning phrase to person B, for two reasons: 1. It is not directed at B, and 2. It is not meant to mean having x is demeaning to B.
flame on? Anyway, I am not against the metally retarded. I was showing that, based on your logic, if I was, then I would be justified in my used of the word, similar to how you justify your use of gay. Also, does this make it right to make fun of the poor or others in need? They have a bit of control over that.