[Unofficial] 11x11x11 sim solve in under 11 minutes (by qqwref)

[qqwref]

Push the limits!

I took about 1.10 seconds per piece, which is equivalent to a 3:53 on the 7x7x7 and a 1:41 on the 5x5x5.

 

[ianography]

Dayum!

 

[JyH]

I'm so confused.

 

[Phlippieskezer]

*Takes bottom jaw off table*

Dude, that's impressive.

P.S. I lol'd at the last paragraph of the video description.

 

[Zane_C]

Your sim cube skills are getting even more extraordinary. :tu

 

[Erzz]

Wow. That's crazy. I just tried to use that sim, it's so hard to control (guess I'm just not used to it) and see the other sides. I can barely sub 2 (minutes) a 2x2. Great job.

 

[iEnjoyCubing]

That's amazing! Especially in sim! Nice job.

 

[cubersmith]

I'm dizzy

 

[AvGalen]

Am I right in assuming that there are 3 types of cube-sim-users?

- Users that start, but never finish it
- A handful of users that actually finish it once or twice
- qqwref

(I know R.Y. also was into it a while ago, even so much that qqwref seriously doubted his realness. But other than them, is there anyone else?)

 

[qqwref]

Heh, there are a bunch of other good people (although I think most are inactive). You can see some on the hi-games and puzzlingaddiction high score lists. I doubt there are more than a few others out there who are good with qCube, though

 

[AvGalen]

Heh, there are a bunch of other good people (although I think most are inactive). You can see some on the hi-games and puzzlingaddiction high score lists. I doubt there are more than a few others out there who are good with qCube, though

So it would be fair to say that their are more active cube-simulators than active cube-simulator-users?

 

[qqwref]

Not really, there are plenty of active people who aren't all that good (or who only do smaller cubes).

 

[aminayuko]

UWR?

 

[izovire]

Awesome!

I know sub-10 solve is clearly possible using a sim.

It is also possible to do it using a physical cube... but humanly impossible. My fastest time is 20:45. At 1.1kg I couldn't turn it efficiently.

 

[masterofthebass]

(I know R.Y. also was into it a while ago, even so much that qqwref seriously doubted his realness. But other than them, is there anyone else?)

You're forgetting michal. Look at his hi-game results.

 

[qqwref]

UWR?

Of course

I know sub-10 solve is clearly possible using a sim.

I agree - my centers can use some improvement - but it will be difficult.

It is also possible to do it using a physical cube... but humanly impossible.

What do you mean?

 

[collinbxyz]

what program is it? I wanna try it (2x2 first =P)!

 

[vcuber13]

qcube

 

[Kirjava]

It is also possible to do it using a physical cube... but humanly impossible. My fastest time is 20:45. At 1.1kg I couldn't turn it efficiently.

I wouldn't say it's "humanly impossible". Maybe with current technology, but with better methods and hardware - who knows?

 

[izovire]

I wouldn't say it's "humanly impossible". Maybe with current technology, but with better methods and hardware - who knows?

I was talking about non-sim 11x11 But yeah with a better method it would be quicker.