• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Beginner 5x5x5, 7x7x7 etc. solution: only 8 algorithms

Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
7
Location
Ohio
I solve mainly for fun and relaxation, not competition, and I enjoy the process more than memorizing algorithms. Not finding much online for beginners/casual cubers with large cubes, I combined techniques from various sources into a method that works for me! (Odd-sized nxnxn puzzles only.)

The goal of this guide: fewest algorithms to memorize. Not speed. (Since some of the 8 algorithms can be mirrored or otherwise adapted in simple ways, there are technically more than 8, but only 8 to memorize.) Disclaimer: I tried to include picture/supercubes, but that step I have not tested as heavily as the rest.

Casual hobbyist solvers of big cubes must be rare indeed, but I hope someone out there finds this helpful!

Here is my one-page PDF how-to, with standard notation, explanatory text, diagrams, and mnemonics. Revised occasionally.
https://adamsimmersive.com/apps/cubing/7x7x7-cube-beginner-solution

Improvement ideas are welcomed!

7x7x7-Cube-Solution-Adams-Immersive.png
 
Hi Morgan,

Well, if the goal is to truly go with the fewest (core) algorithms, in this video, I show how to use variations of the Niklas commutator to solve the entire 3x3x3 (and meddle with pieces of big cubes towards the end). (Orienting the corners and edges requires knowing which "direction" to apply the Nilkas (and to apply 2 Niklas), but it's still just essentially one core alg.)

Also, I am kind of curious how your method would handle a simple edge-pairing case like this. (The generating algorithm is LONG, but that's how to use two applications of the Niklas commutator... from my video.)
 
Cool! Using one algorithm in multiple ways is very appealing.

My method avoids that edge-pairing in step 3 (“If any edges are in place already but flipped, displace those early”) and it’s never come up for me, but I suspect that failing to clear those early would still leave you in a situation you could get out of with the “as needed” second algorithm in step 3, ( U2 xR ) × 5. I won’t swear to it though!
 
Back
Top