Race to Full OLL

[Jaycee]

lol @ trolls

 

[Jorghi]

UMM All he is doing is moving out the f2l pair and trying to intuitively do Winter Variation inverses lol xD

 

[uberCuber]

UMM All he is doing is moving out the f2l pair and trying to intuitively do Winter Variation inverses lol xD

You make no sense.

 

[TiLiMayor]

OLL 23: R2 D' R U2 R' D R U2 R
Average: 1.61
1.36, 1.88, 1.63, 1.41, 1.41, 1.83, 1.78, 1.90, (1.28), 1.36, (1.94), 1.50

OLL 55: [TO DO]

oh, by the way, vcuber13, yuu right..

 

[ben1996123]

That's a very good point. I should have added: you're not supposed to use 2-look OLL!

too late.

edit: also, I didnt check that that was the correct 2nd look, if I do 2 look then I know what the 2nd look alg will be for most olls.

 

[Ranzha]

Whats your TPS PB.

Like, 16. When I T-perm'd in 0.87. The most fun I've had tps-bombing is when I 1.4'd my ridiculous Na-perm.
Well, it's not "mine". It's just the one I use.

ALSO, about the one-look vs. two-look argument, it's a 2-look solution in a single recognition step. One look, solved as if it were two. Like Lucas's Compound OLL, in a sense.

 

[Jaycee]

^ Yay for this guy making sense!

 

[Tall5001]

OLL 55

Average: 2.27

2.69 2.19 2.30 2.00 2.03 2.09 2.13 2.33 (3.47) 2.80 2.09 (1.94)

For learning this alg 5 minutes ago this is pretty good

Alg used: r U2 R' U' M (R U R' U') r U' r'

TPS: 5.28

OLL 23

Average: 1.82

1.84 1.66 1.75 1.88 1.75 (1.96) 1.91 (1.56) 1.94 1.86 1.81 1.77

Already knew this one but still never timed it! no sup 2's!

Alg used: R U R' U' (R U' R' U2)(R U' R' U2) R U R'

TPS: 8.24

Though i already know 30+ OLLs this will be nice to expand my algs!

 

[Ranzha]

I got thinking about this concept of OLL algs that are 2-look solutions but are still (or can still be) fast.

Here's a list of the OLL algs I use that are 2-look solutions:

OLL 2: F (R U R' U') S (R U R' U') f'
OLL 3: f' (L' U' L U) y (l F) (R U R' U') F'
OLL 4: f (R U R' U') f' U F (R U R' U') F'
OLL 13: F (R U R' U') (l U R' D') (R U' l')
OLL 14: F' (L' U' L U) (r' U' L) D (L' U r)

Not a huge bunch, but these are definitely based on the OCLL algs and FRUR'U'F'.
Note: I excluded things such as (f R U R' U' f') because they were just copies of the original alg. =P

Anyone else got these kinds of OLL algs?

 

[Jorghi]

^ I don't really feel like they are 2 Look. I just thing its a normal OLL algorithm that allows you to visually see the process of orientating the edges and then the corners.

Like how the Y Perm has a T OLL in it. That OLL has an EO alg in it.

The Looks mean the number of recognition attempts required. If you can do the whole OLL algorithm blindfold then its not 2 look.

 

[Ranzha]

Just because it takes you one look doesn't mean it isn't a 2-look solution also. Someone who didn't know OLL 13 can apply (F R U R' U' F') to orient edges and (x' D R U R' D' R U' R' x) to solve OCLL.
The difference between my examples and yours (the Y-perm) are that as yours is just a combination of two random algorithms, mine are two specific algorithms from a particular set, which, in this case, is 2-look OLL. Our examples are similar in that they are comprised of two algorithms in succession, but mine deal specifically with solving a particular case in a step using two algorithms that solve other particular cases in the same step.

Hope this gets across okay. It's tough to put in words, but you don't get what I'm trying to say otherwise.

 

[Schmidt]

Anyone else got these kinds of OLL algs?

For the "Awkwards" I use "Sune" + little "T" when there is headlights ( mirroring it to the left hand for the ..well.. mirror case) and little "T" + big "T" for the other (both left and right hand)

 

[Jorghi]

Just because it takes you one look doesn't mean it isn't a 2-look solution also. Someone who didn't know OLL 13 can apply (F R U R' U' F') to orient edges and (x' D R U R' D' R U' R' x) to solve OCLL.
The difference between my examples and yours (the Y-perm) are that as yours is just a combination of two random algorithms, mine are two specific algorithms from a particular set, which, in this case, is 2-look OLL. Our examples are similar in that they are comprised of two algorithms in succession, but mine deal specifically with solving a particular case in a step using two algorithms that solve other particular cases in the same step.

Hope this gets across okay. It's tough to put in words, but you don't get what I'm trying to say otherwise.

Umm... this is basically 2 look OLL. Except you are doing both recognition stages at the first step. But if you got that case a lot of times it would eventually feel like a 1Look OLL.

Nice idea.

 

[MaeLSTRoM]

Umm... this is basically 2 look OLL. Except you are doing both recognition stages at the first step. But if you got that case a lot of times it would eventually feel like a 1Look OLL.

Nice idea.

Well, it really is 1-look because if you know that the OLL is solved by those 2 algs in sucession, you only need to do 1 recog step, just execute 2 algs in a row instead of 1.

 

[Jorghi]

Well, it really is 1-look because if you know that the OLL is solved by those 2 algs in sucession, you only need to do 1 recog step, just execute 2 algs in a row instead of 1.

^ I don't really feel like they are 2 Look. I just thing its a normal OLL algorithm that allows you to visually see the process of orientating the edges and then the corners.

Like how the Y Perm has a T OLL in it. That OLL has an EO alg in it.

The Looks mean the number of recognition attempts required. If you can do the whole OLL algorithm blindfold then its not 2 look.

You should be arguing with the other guy lol.

 

[Clayy9]

​

 

[Clayy9]

ROUND 2
Ended!

OLL 55
[Remember, 1 new OLL and 1 previous OLL for new participants; if you've already completed it, you don't have to do it again.]

Ao12 scrambles
1) U2 F2 U F2 L2 U2 L2 D' L2 D F' L' F U2 L2 U' L' U L
2) R2 D B2 L2 D2 L2 D' B2 U B2 F L F' D2 U' B2 R' U' R'
3) U' R2 D' F2 R2 U R2 F2 D' L' D' B D' B' R' D L D' R'
4) F2 R U2 B2 D2 R2 U2 L2 U2 R2 B' U' B L' B' U L B' R'
5) F2 R2 D B2 R2 D2 L2 U' F2 L2 B L B' D U F2 R U' R'
6) R U2 F2 R2 F2 R U2 R2 F2 R' F' R F' U2 R2 U R U' R'
7) D' R2 D B2 U' B2 U R2 U2 R2 B' R' B U2 R2 U' R' U R
8) D' F2 U R2 D2 R2 F2 U' R2 B2 F L F' D2 U' B2 R' U' R'
9) U2 R U2 R' U2 L2 B2 R' F2 R' D R F D' F' R B2 F2 L2
10) U' F2 D2 L2 D L2 D F2 R2 U F R F' U2 R2 U R U' R'
11) F2 U2 F2 U F2 U F2 U R2 U2 F R F' U2 R2 U R U' R'
12) D2 F2 R2 U B2 U2 F2 U' L2 B R U2 R2 U2 B U R U' R'

OLL 38

Ao12 scrambles
1) U L2 F2 U' L2 U F2 U' F2 U F2 U B L B' L2 F' L' F'
2) L2 U B2 D2 R2 D' F2 D' B2 U F2 U2 B L B' L2 F' L' F'
3) L2 D' R2 D2 L2 R2 U' L2 B2 U R2 U' B' L B' L2 F' L' F'
4) F2 U2 L2 B2 F2 D' F2 D R2 U' R2 U B' L B' L2 F' L' F'
5) D' B2 D B2 L2 U' B2 L2 U B2 L2 U B' L' U L U' L B'
6) F2 R2 B2 D L2 D' B2 R2 U F2 U2 L' U B' U B U' L F2
7) R2 U B2 U2 R2 U R2 U B2 U' F2 L2 B' L B2 L' B L2 F2
8) R2 B2 D R2 D' R2 D2 R2 F2 D' B2 U2 B' L B2 L' B L2 F2
9) D' F2 U' F2 R2 U' L2 U R2 B2 R2 U' B' L B' L2 F' L' F'
10) U2 F2 U2 F2 L2 B2 U' B2 D B2 U R2 B' L B' L2 F' L' F'
11) U F2 U' R2 F2 U2 F2 U2 F2 R2 U L2 B' L B2 L' B L2 F2
12) D' L2 D F2 D' B2 D R2 F2 R2 F2 U' B' L B2 L' B L2 F2
​

 

[vcuber13]

why do you need scrambles? why not just say do this oll 12 times?

 

[Clayy9]

why do you need scrambles? why not just say do this oll 12 times?

You don't have to use the scrambles. Some people may use them, most probably won't.

 

[Jaycee]

OLL 38

2.72, 2.96, 1.93, 1.97, 2.85, 2.28, 2.08, 2.39, 1.32, 2.05, 1.92, 1.58 (so inconsisent)

AVERAGE : 2.17

EDIT : Already knew this OLL I'm gunna learn all the I's (like OLL 55) tonight