How long did it take you to sub 40?

How long did it take you to sub 40?

  • 1-2 weeks

    Votes: 6 24.0%
  • 3-4 weeks

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • 5-6 weeks

    Votes: 3 12.0%
  • 7-8 weeks

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • 9-10 weeks

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • 11-12 weeks

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • 13-14 weeks

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • 15-16 weeks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 16+ weeks

    Votes: 7 28.0%

  • Total voters
    25
plz stop asking this question it doesn't take that long. It took me 9 days. All you have to do is know 2 Look OLL/PLL and F2L.

But I got sub 30 after 38 days.. But thats because I didn't learn all the PLL. You just have to practice right.
 
Last edited:
it took me forever because i didnt know where to learn fridrich method and i never really timed my self seriously. i would just do a solve here and there. as soon as i learned fridrich i got it down below 40 i think in 3 days.
 
plz stop asking this question it doesn't take that long. It took me 9 days. All you have to do is know 2 Look OLL/PLL and F2L.

But I got sub 30 after 38 days.. But thats because I didn't learn all the PLL. You just have to practice right.

OLL, PLL and F2L definitely aren't a requirement for sub 40... With the full method that Dan Brown teaches you it's easy to be sub 30, even sub 25.
 
i was like 3 months into solving the cube, not speedsolving but solving i just put 16+ cause idgaf and this is pointless, just practice and you'll be there soon
 
Ya I agree with u ^. Its bad to ask how long it took because its just like olympic running o-o you don't know if you are a world #1 athlete until you are at your peak o-o
 
This poll already exists. The difference between 40 and 45 seconds is relatively small.. I think I went from 45 to 40 in less than a week, so who cares?

The /thread is totally justified.
 
Back
Top