Absolute F2L - website

Is it worth learning a pile of F2L tricks, or is it better to just have a basic set of F2L moves that you can execute without thinking?
How about learning a pile of F2L tricks, that you can execute without thinking?
Besides, there are basic set of F2L moves on the site. You can learn just them and leave the rest.

some cases are faster when you know the algorithm!!!
Aren't ALL cases faster when you know the algorithm? ;)

Thanks, every algorithm is welcome :)
Every once in a while we will add some algs sent to us.

cross on left variations would be really nice.
This

would be awesome. And it would make sense since it is an F2L site to include variations of F2L styles (well at least COL). I think Tomasz could help a whole bunch with that. I've already created a PDF file a while ago.
Maybe we will add the basic algs in some spare time.
It will be much faster though, if someone sent me algs :)

please upload the offline version somewhere else.
thank you.
Added some mirrors. Check the first post.
 
I dunno if this would go well with the site, but here are some random cases (to force OLL skip) that can be nice to know, if you don't have them already:
- (R' F R F') (R' U2 R2 U R2' U R) - this one is already nice for this case, but look what OLL is done
- (R2 x') U' R' U (R x') and the inverse
- L (R' F R F') L' and the inverse
- R d' R U R' d R' = (U) F R' F' R U' R U R'
- F' R U R' U' R' F R and the inverse
- r U' r' U' r U r'

Just like multislotting, it's impossible to know all of these, but you'll really appreciate it if you ever see one of these cases in an official solve :p
 
Last edited:
Aren't ALL cases faster when you know the algorithm? ;)

Intuitive F2L is basic and you can do all 42 cases without learning them! also all the empty slot cases! but some algorithms are better than intuitive for example
U (R' F R F') U (R U R') these case is pure intuitive but much better is the algorithmic case M U L F' L' U' M'
 
Back
Top