Sune or Anti-Sune?

Which do you prefer: Sune or Ant-Sune?

  • Sune

    Votes: 32 30.5%
  • Anti_Sune

    Votes: 56 53.3%
  • Doesn't Matter

    Votes: 17 16.2%

  • Total voters
    105
Sune is easier to recognize. Antisune is faster execution. But half the time, I don't AUF and do the LU Sune mirror, which is slower. So it doesn't matter. I prefer the 6 move OLLs, except OH, where pi is the best, then the sune/antisune.
 
Sune
10/12 Average: 1.52
Individual Times: 1.33, 1.72, 1.62, 1.61, (1.22), 1.60, 1.34, 1.77, 1.34, 1.60, (2.05), 1.24

Anti-Sune
10/12 Average: 1.54
Individual Times: 1.32, 2.21, 1.21, 1.18, (1.16), 1.86, 1.59, 1.74, (2.36), 1.65, 1.49, 1.57

I lock up less in regular Sune, so I like it better.
 
I miss "both" so I can't vote.

I use both because I do CLL/COLL/ZB. In the last case it's actually four because of mirror cases, or rather eight because I also do them from the B side.

So I prefer all possible Sunes exept the ones done in F and B (ex: B U B' U B U2 B')

:)

BTW: not on topic but about Sune, try this double layer double Sune OLL I just found: r U r' U R U' R' U R U' M' U' r'
 
Last edited:
I do anti sune much faster because of no regrips. Ha I use Petrus so I'm way to fast at the sune for my level since I've literally done it 5,000 times at the very very least. My antisune is under .70 and my sune is slightly slower.
 
Back
Top