Mike Hughey said:
Very awesome! But you had a lot of long pauses in there - my sub-2 had substantially fewer pauses. What that means is that you will probably be able to get sub-1:30 very easy, while that will probably be a very hard goal for me to achieve. It looks to me like you have the potential to be a top BLD solver!
oh Mike, thank you so much for those kind words ! This solve has consequently less pauses than my normal solves, especially when I must handle parity or some hard corner permutation cases...
I will keep practicing, and try to think ahead while performing an algorithm, thank you very much indeed.
My next goal will be sub-2 average ! I believe you have the same goal, right

?