Zeroing Tutorial/Discussion (Text+Video!)

[y3k9]

cfop tutorial please.

 

[mr. giggums]

I think that this will be very useful in FMC.

 

[waffle=ijm]

well Fazzles Rowe and Anfony are the CFOPers. Beg to them to make one. Because I'm making one on Roux....

 

[StachuK1992]

I think that this will be very useful in FMC.

Yes! That is a very plausible intention, especially when one does not limit the phasing to only 2 or 3 moves!

y3k9: please wait a bit. Some examples from the Roux guide will surely help you.

 

[Weston]

I've been doing this for OH since September.
I just didn't want to tell anybody either

 

[waffle=ijm]

SINCE WHEN DID FAZ TALK TO YOU >_>

 

[Weston]

I figured it out on my own thanks.
I can't do it for 2h though. Too hard to look ahead.

 

[y3k9]

please wait a bit. Some examples from the Roux guide will surely help you.

I'm just making sure the message sinks into all your heads... You see I'm very demanding....

And I don't believe Weston.

 

[StachuK1992]

I don't believe Weston either. I think he's just trying to take credit from Faz and the originals.

I am not one of the originals, I simply find methods that no one knows about, researches, documents, and publishes.

 

[BigSams]

As I think I've mentioned in the video, I cannot do this yet in speedsolves. This is why I'm developing a more algorithmic phasing system.

Well thank goodness for that! The descriptions seemed to be all over the place because so many different techniques were mentioned. Looking forward to it, whenever you guys release a site/new page on old site.

 

[riffz]

I think that this will be very useful in FMC.

 

[StachuK1992]

<JaiG> maggot___: the key isn't to look ahead, but rather, to look behind.

Let me explain this in better detail:
When one looks ahead, they think something along the lines of
"If I do this and this, what will my cube look like?"

When one looks behind, they think something along the lines of
"If I do this, what would have happened to the pieces as opposed to if I did that?"

 

[jms_gears1]

I think it might offer many practical uses in SpeedBLD

 

[Cubezz]

<JaiG> maggot___: the key isn't to look ahead, but rather, to look behind.

Let me explain this in better detail:
When one looks ahead, they think something along the lines of
"If I do this and this, what will my cube look like?"

When one looks behind, they think something along the lines of
"If I do this, what would have happened to the pieces as opposed to if I did that?"

Great, you need to be able to look so far ahead that you look behind 0_0
Edit: I guess I'll use this when I get good enough, and when I understand how to use it.

 

[Anthony]

Should be here some day. :3

Zeroing.

 

[y3k9]

So, it's just forcing a pll skip? GREAT, PLL takes SO MUCH time to do.

 

[StachuK1992]

So, it's just forcing a pll skip?

No.

 

[RyanReese09]

I don't believe Weston either. I think he's just trying to take credit from Faz and the originals.

I am not one of the originals, I simply find methods that no one knows about, researches, documents, and publishes.

like 2gll and cpls .

very hard to lookahead for this, i doubt ill be using anytime soon :-/
maybe for OH.

 

[Cyrus C.]

Everyone complaining about look ahead needs to man up.

 

[y3k9]

No.

Please explain, cuz that's what I saw.