Roux, fridrich, or zz

Status
Not open for further replies.

y3k9

Veteran
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
413
Which do you think is best? And remember, no flaming kids.
Ok cuz some people were going off topic here are the rule (all electricdooie fault, blame him)-
NO OFF-TOPIC...ness
Post a reason for each for each response
DONT QOUTE SUPER LONG QUOTES, i hate when people do this.
And thats it.
 
Last edited:
Which do you think is best?

This is a pointless thread, which seems to be only here to start a flame war.

None is better than the other. The only difference is what people prefer to use/learn, depending on their own learning style/way their brains work.

There is no "one method is the best method."
There is no best method.

Methods depend on the person learning it.
Whatever is best for you, is best for you.
 
Which do you think is best?

This is a pointless thread, which seems to be only here to start a flame war.

None is better than the other. The only difference is what people prefer to use/learn, depending on their own learning style/way their brains work.

There is no "one method is the best method."
There is no best method.

Methods depend on the person learning it.
Whatever is best for you, is best for you.
This is indeed pointless but im interested and other people might come here out of interest too. I am not a troll.
all equal.

Well, that wont get a discussion started.

but it's true. Anyone who says that one method is better than the other is just annoying and doesn't know what he/she is talking about.
Im looking for people's opinions of which is best, im sure im not the only person that perfers a certain method.
 
Preference is different from the "best"

Sigh. I said which you think is the best. Not which is the best.

Then it becomes a "What's your favorite method?" thread. Not really needed, as it's pretty easy to find most peoples favorite method. It's usually their main method.
As I said before Im just interested.
Preference is different from the "best"

Sigh. I said which you think is the best. Not which is the best.

Then this forum will instantly be biased towards Fridrich since the majority uses it. Not a lot of people use ZZ and Roux but they both have extreme potential to be fast.
Like, wtf? A lot of people use zz, roux, or something else.
 
In comparison in numbers

CFOP>Roux, ZZ, or something else

Out of the active members (which is a lot), I'm thinking at most 30 (overestimation) of them use roux. I'm a Roux user and I don't think it's the best method, because new developments happen everyday.
 
Last edited:
In comparison in numbers

CFOP>Roux, ZZ, or something else

Out of the active members (which is a lot), I'm thinking at most 30 of them use roux. I'm a Roux user and I don't think it's the best method, because new developments happen everyday.

Whats cfop? And why dont you switch if you dont like roux.
 
In comparison in numbers

CFOP>Roux, ZZ, or something else

Out of the active members (which is a lot), I'm thinking at most 30 of them use roux. I'm a Roux user and I don't think it's the best method, because new developments happen everyday.

Whats cfop? And why dont you switch if you dont like roux.

CFOP is an alternative name for Fridrich. I didn't say I didn't like roux, I said I think it's not the best method. As cubing progresses, each of these methods will keep developing.
 
In comparison in numbers

CFOP>Roux, ZZ, or something else

Out of the active members (which is a lot), I'm thinking at most 30 of them use roux. I'm a Roux user and I don't think it's the best method, because new developments happen everyday.

Whats cfop? And why dont you switch if you dont like roux.

CFOP is an alternative name for Fridrich. I didn't say I didn't like roux, I said I think it's not the best method. As cubing progresses, each of these methods will keep developing.
okays.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top