Weekly competition 2008-14

4x4x4: 2:53.96, 3:01.84, (2:44.14), (POP), (POP) = Is this DNF?
Comment: Toke a big break from 4x4...
 
Last edited:
2x2x2
(11.02), 13.63, (POP), 18.16, 18.50 = 16.73
In case your wondering how my cube poped, a corner cap fell off.

3x3x3
(42.57), 29.24, (28.26), 29.12, 30.90 = 30.02
Hmm... The first solve was horrible. Then the rest was good. This is my best average of 5

Magic
(1.69), 1.45, (1.40), 1.63, 1.57 = 1.55
Fairly average
 
5x5x5 bld
DNF (24:19, off by 3-cycle T-centers)

wow, warming up your memo is so important. i had to think about every fourth location...

multi bld
19/22, 1:28h (54 min memo), (16 points)

I spent a few minutes on fixing a memo mistake, that's the reason for my bad execution time.
mistakes:
picked up one cube with the wrong orientation (scrambled centers)
2 cubes were off by a 3-cycle each (execution mistakes...)

btw. i need a larger desk!

Tim........ your friggin AMAZING!!!
 
Chris Hardwick:
--------------
3x3x3: 15.22 16.05 (13.60) 15.17 (18.02) = 15.48
2x2x2_bld: 30.05 DNF 21.15
3x3x3_bld: DNF 1:35.11 1:37.36
4x4x4_bld: DNF 7:00.16 DNF
5x5x5_bld: DNF DNF DNF

I did some of these solves while racing/training with Daniel Beyer over yahoo messenger. The last 2 5x5's were both only off by 2 mis-oriented centrals. In one case I memo'd incorrectly, and in the other I simply forgot to flip them. This wasn't my week for big cubes. Training now for D.C. next month.

Chris
 
forgot to post my relay times.

2,3,4: 1:33.00
2,3,4,5: 3:25.56

for the 2345, 5x5 was 1:50ish, and 4x4 was 1:10. Stupid 2x2 takes almost as long as the 3x3.

--EDIT--
Decided to do BLD since I want a better official.

3x3 BLD: DNF, 1:44.93, 1:53.00 = 1:44.93
 
Last edited:
First the girls’ times so far:
Marie Hughey:
Magic: 3.55, 4.71, 3.18, 3.84, 3.40 = 3.60
Master Magic: 8.02, 7.09, 8.36, 7.19, 8.28 = 7.83

Rebecca Hughey:
Magic: 2.90, 2.52, 2.84, 2.46, DNF = 2.75
Comment: Just like at Chattahoochee, Rebecca smokes me at Magic. She’s amazing.
Master Magic: 5.11, 7.36, 5.91, DNF, 5.80 = 6.36

I still haven’t done multiBLD yet, but I thought I’d go ahead and post now in case I can’t get new cubes tonight or otherwise don’t find time (I gave away a few on our trip, so I need some more). So here goes everything else:

Mike Hughey:
2x2x2: 13.47 (+2), 10.75, 11.94, 15.55, 9.40 = 12.05
3x3x3: 30.81, 33.91, 29.38, 28.88, 34.40 = 31.37
4x4x4: 1:50.00 (O), 1:48.28 (P), 1:41.44, 1:47.43 (O), 1:54.66 (O) = 1:48.57
Comment: I practice 5x5x5 but never 4x4x4, but my 4x4x4 seems to improve faster than my 5x5x5. But maybe that’s because I had so much more room for improvement. :)
5x5x5: 3:30.28, 3:25.02, 3:34.31, 3:08.97, 3:09.19 = 3:21.50
Comment: Back down to earth after my miraculous Chattahoochee result. But I must admit that I feel like these were bad solves, so I think I’ve generally improved.
2x2x2 BLD: 1:11.19, 1:05.61, 52.33 = 52.33
3x3x3 BLD: 2:45.96, 3:31.11, 3:00.31 = 2:45.96
4x4x4 BLD: 13:07.96 (7:11 mem), 14:00.43 (5:24 mem), 14:23.33 (8:15 mem) = 13:07.96
Comment: Wouldn’t you know it? I get them all now. Times were still pretty bad, though. Every one had some problem – the first one had too many edge cycles (the worst I’ve ever seen), the second one I messed up the centers, but I backtracked and fixed them; the third one just took me too long to memorize.
5x5x5 BLD: DNF (23:14.26, 10:30 mem), DNF (26:54.34, 13:56 mem), DNF (29:59.40, 16:15 mem) = DNF
Comment: Bleah. If it weren’t for the relay, I wouldn’t have gotten a single 5x5x5 BLD this week.
3x3x3 MultiBLD: 7/8, 1:17:58.57 (48:32 mem)
Comment: Ugh. The second cube just had 2 corners misoriented. Apparently I memorized the wrong corner to twist for one corner. I MUST figure out a way to speed up; this was perilously close to going over the maximum time under the new rules.
3x3x3 OH: 51.48, 1:08.69, 53.44, 1:01.86, 1:08.75 = 1:01.33
3x3x3 WF: 2:43.77 (+2), 3:18.68, 2:52.44, 2:37.13, 1:40.06 = 2:44.45
Comment: Like Dene, I only practice by doing these solves each week, and like Dene, I’m amazed how much I’m improving. However, unlike Dene, I’m not improving nearly as fast. :) The scrambles this week seemed a little easy, though, so I’m not sure I believe these are representative times for me. The last one was just plain lucky – the F2L practically fell together.
2-4 Relay: DNF (23:04.97, 12:22 mem)
Comment: Ugh. The 3x3x3 and 4x4x4 were right; the 2x2x2 only had 2 corners misoriented.
2-5 Relay: DNF (1:05:01.26, 34:10 mem)
Comment: Will I ever get this? This was so frustrating - the 2x2x2, 3x3x3, and 5x5x5 were all correct (my only successful 5x5x5 BLD solve this week), but the 4x4x4 was wrong only in that I had corner parity, and when I went to fix it, I did the T perm but then forgot to do the PLL parity algorithm afterwards to fix the edges. :( So careless.
Magic: 2.80, 2.69, 6.13, 2.94, 3.05 = 2.93
Master Magic: 4.36, 5.47, 4.94, 5.53, 5.86 = 5.31
Clock: Still don’t have one (I’m working on it, though. Joey, I do want yours!)
MegaMinx: 3:30.50, 3:26.11, 3:11.46, 3:07.65, 3:26.21 = 3:21.26
Pyraminx: 16.78, 23.91, 30.61, 14.43, 26.31 = 22.33
Square-1: 1:20.36 (P), 1:55.09 (P), 2:05.66 (P), 57.75, 1:19.28 = 1:31.58
3x3x3 Fewest Moves: 33 moves
I think there’s a problem with this week’s scramble; I tried both the original and the optimal scrambles a bunch of times and they seem to come out different. I hope we can use the optimal scramble – it was way nicer for me. Here’s my optimal scramble solution:
R F2 R’ B2 R F2 R’ B2 R F’ D’ L’ D2 L’ D’ F L’ F’ U’ F B U B’ L’ U L U R’ U2 R2 B’ R’ B
x-cross: R . F’ D’ L’ D2 L’ D’ F L’
2nd pair: F’ U’ F
3rd pair: B U B’ L’ U L
4th pair (fortunately solves all but 3 corners): U R’ U2 R2 B’ R’ B
insert at . for corners: F2 R’ B2 R F2 R’ B2 R
Lucky ending, but no luck with cancellations – if I had found something good, this could have been a really nice solve. Anyway, it’s my best ever. It took me about 55 minutes to finish this and check it; I ran out of time before I found a better insertion. I had a 42 move solution after less than 10 minutes, and then I thought to just try an extended cross, which worked well.

Just in case we had to use the original scramble, here’s my solution for that (I figured I needed the practice!) – 40 moves:
2x2x2: B’ R2 U2 R B’ R2
2x2x3: U’ L B’ U
cross + 3rd pair: B’ L’ U’ L2 U L’
4th pair: B D’ B’
OLL: R D B D’ B’ R’ B D
PLL: B D B’ U B2 D’ B U’ R’ L’ B2 R L
 
Last edited:
3x3x3 WF: 2:43.77 (+2), 3:18.68, 2:52.44, 2:37.13, 1:40.06 = 2:44.45
Comment: Like Dene, I only practice by doing these solves each week, and like Dene, I’m amazed how much I’m improving. However, unlike Dene, I’m not improving nearly as fast. :) The scrambles this week seemed a little easy, though, so I’m not sure I believe these are representative times for me. The last one was just plain lucky – the F2L practically fell together.

Yay! Good to see some more competition! Me and you can be first and second in the world :) . However, who will be first? :p . I think you'll find that the F2L will always start to come together well for you. I don't know why, but mine seem to come out sub50 every time now, its crazy!
 
3x3: 17.74 (13.60) (17.77) 15.05 14.82 ==> Avg: 15.87
Not bad. That 17 killed the avg.
4x4: (1:18.22) 1:21.22 (1:24.10) 1:19.72 1:20.16 ==> Avg: 1:20.37
Man, not practicing for a couple weeks just ruins your times. I dropped almost 10 seconds.
 
3x3x3 WF: 2:43.77 (+2), 3:18.68, 2:52.44, 2:37.13, 1:40.06 = 2:44.45
Comment: Like Dene, I only practice by doing these solves each week, and like Dene, I’m amazed how much I’m improving. However, unlike Dene, I’m not improving nearly as fast. :) The scrambles this week seemed a little easy, though, so I’m not sure I believe these are representative times for me. The last one was just plain lucky – the F2L practically fell together.

Yay! Good to see some more competition! Me and you can be first and second in the world :) . However, who will be first? :p . I think you'll find that the F2L will always start to come together well for you. I don't know why, but mine seem to come out sub50 every time now, its crazy!

I think it's going to be quite a challenge to beat Anssi! But maybe second and third aren't so impossible. I can't believe that my best time this week would have been 9th in the world, and my average based on the last 3 solves (with feet always uses mean of 3, right?) would have been 2:23.21, which would be 4th in the world! But I just had one good solve, Dene - you had lots.

I still think this was a lucky week. But occasional sub-2 solves no longer look impossible, anyway.
 
Oh definitely. It just seems to have come to me, I'm sure it'll do the same for you. As for Mr. Vanhala, I hope he's been practising, because sub40 is my aim :) . I'll be doing my solves in a few hours (I really need to make a start on this essay first) and we'll see how I go!
 
Rafal Guzewicz

3x3x3 BLD: 57.69 1:06.75 59.06 = 57.69
Nice.
5x5x5 BLD: DNF DNF DNF = DNF
What's wrong with these scrambles? Second one was 13:13 off by two centers.
 
Thanks Kai! As for meeting, I was considering going to German Open, so I could do some bigcubes bld solves, but now I know that it will have to wait…
 
5x5x5 bld
#2 20:26.48 (7:30 memo)

YES! i made so many mistakes during execution (jumped over a few locations, messed up the parity algorithm), but i was able to fix all of them.
Finally!
NO! :eek:
NO! :mad:
NO! :(

That's it, I'm doing a 5BLD every day. Be warned, I'm trying syllables for 3x3x3 BLD right now, and I'm not stopping at that. ;)

And your success sounds ike my first 4x4x4 BLD...
Just wondering, how is your exec so slow? :p
(If I'd want you to be faster, I'd encourage you to improve it, because it's easier to do than memo.)
 
Back
Top