How did you learn how to solve the cube?!

I learnt beginners from a website and then started to learn fridrich from Dan Harris' 'speedsolving the cube' although i have now learnt different algorithms from different sources.

Megaminx and 2x2x2 were self taught, i needed parity algorithms for 4x4x4
 
3x3 A whole lot of sources, mainly websites.
I was staying in a hostel in Malaysia and it was raining constantly for 3 days. There were a whole lot of cubes in the common room so I started playing around with them. Went straight from beginners method to Fridrich. I think I used badmephisto's site...?

2x2: Same solution as 3x3.
4x4: Intuitively solved by reduction. (looked up on Google for the parity)
5x5: Same as 4x4 (I am sure there are better methods that what I use)
6x6: Same as 4x4
7x7: Same as 4x4
Square-1: Google (I really wish I developed my own solution to it....)

I came up with my own unique albeit crappy solutions to many other puzzles such as:

Skewb and all variations (my solution is sooooo slow)
2x3x3
3x3x4
Floppy cube
Crazy 4x4x4
Impossiball
2x2x3
Megaminx
Rainbow cube
Super square 1
Platypus
and about 30 other misc puzzles.
 
Dan Brown :) His beginner method video is what taught me, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that video. Any speedcuber that disses Dan for that video needs to get his head checked.

There are many things wrong with that video. Still, its not like people watch it because they choose to watch it. Its just the first thing they find and its good enough, and thats ok.

But anyway ;p, I learned the worst possible beginners method from some website that I can't find anymore. But I would trade a website explanation for some other video explanation (no matter how good) any time... It just seems much faster to get information from a page than a video... I would maybe check the video if I get stuck. But I guess many people disagree :)
 
I learned the worst possible beginners method from some website that I can't find anymore. But I would trade a website explanation for some other video explanation (no matter how good) any time... It just seems much faster to get information from a page than a video... I would maybe check the video if I get stuck. But I guess many people disagree :)

YOU MEAN YOU DIDN'T LEARN FROM YOUR OWN TUTORIAL!?? :eek:
 
kadettv8 told me beginners method + cross and badmephisto's video's helped me with F2L.
Right now I’m trying blind but I'll need to practice more before doing a real attempt.
 
Earlier this summer I had learned how to do a simple layer-by-layer method. Shelley and I were playing game. We started with two cubes scrambled to the same state. I made three moves on cube A, didn't touch cube B, and handed them both to her. Then she had to figure out my three moves, copy them on cube B, and make three new moves on cube A. Then I had to figure out what three moves she had made, copy them on B, etc.

This was going well, but frequently I found she was undoing one of my moves, or that her second or third move simply didn't make any sense - it didn't help set up the next corner to go in once we had built a cross. I didn't particularly think she was messing with me, but I couldn't figure out why she wouldn't help me out to build the first layer faster.

Then, after ten or so exchanges, I copied her three moves and found to my amazement that both of the first two layers were done. For a second I thought this was some sort of insane cosmic coincidence, but then I realized Shelley was laughing at me.

"Oh," I said. "So that's what you were doing." And that's how I learned about F2L.
 
Dan Brown for Beginners, then Lancetheblueknight for CFOP and finally Dan Harris for all my PLLs. I taught myself 4x4x4, besides Parity. Emile's tutorial for Square-1 and Cookingfat for Magic. :D
 
Last edited:
pogobat, but when i saw his videos where he was solving it I thought he wasn't so good, and I started looking for a new tutorial. And then i discovered badmephisto's channel and learnt a REAL speedsolving method, damn, he's a good teacher. So, thanks badmephisto, you rock.

Off topic: Now i'm just practising that, and I'm in process of learning full PLL. OLL scares me, but I plan swapping to ZZ because i'm lazy with algs :P
I just solve 3x3x3's, I can't buy big cubes in my country and they are expensive, but i would like to have a 4x4x4.
 
Dan Brown :) His beginner method video is what taught me, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that video. Any speedcuber that disses Dan for that video needs to get his head checked.

There are many things wrong with that video. Still, its not like people watch it because they choose to watch it. Its just the first thing they find and its good enough, and thats ok.

But anyway ;p, I learned the worst possible beginners method from some website that I can't find anymore. But I would trade a website explanation for some other video explanation (no matter how good) any time... It just seems much faster to get information from a page than a video... I would maybe check the video if I get stuck. But I guess many people disagree :)

You could be more abstract minded (more intuitive) than other people.

About Dan's video. This is always something wrong with every (this includes yours) tutorial video. But from what I gather, you have been successful on your video, Dan on his, Rob with his, etc. I guess it just depends on the personality and presentation. For example: Your video is pretty much "let's get down to business", Dan's video is like "hey this is easy and fun, you can do it too"
I'm not saying yours is bad by any means. :) Just trying to explain why i think why people like Dan Brown's tutorial :)
 
I learned the beginners method when I was in the hospital for my Daughter. Found a crappy Rubik's cube at Walgreens and started watching you-tube tutorials. Stayed up ALL night until I could do it, then bought Dan Harris' book "Speed Solving the Cube" to learn futher. Now, I'm using badmephisto.com as I'm trying to learn all the OLL and PLL algs. My brain is fried!!!
 
I would have been so much better now if I had stuck with cubing back in 2007, when I first learned beginner's method. I was at around 1:30 when my stickers wore off, leaving me without a cube for a good year and a half. I used to think when stickers wore off, you had to buy a new cube, hahaha, so for the longest time, I just didn't have one. Then, I finally got one again, and found Dan Harris's book, "Speedsolving the Cube" and started learning Fridrich from that. I didn't yet know about you tube tutorials, or DIY cubes. So, I learned F2L between that book and his website, cubestation.co.uk, and took quite a while to master them. Then, I copied every single LL alg onto paper, and spent the next 6 months or so learning them. It took forever. Then, I found out about you tube tutorials. I started finding better LL algs, and changed a few of the ones I was using, as well as how to solve F2L without strictly using algs. I didn't know you could do this, for some reason. I thought you had to use the algs, hahaha. After a while, I started finding my own ways of changing the F2L algs, so I could do the cases faster. One day, I saw a video about DIY cubes and Eastsheen cubes, and thought "why would anyone want to buy a crappy copy version of a cube when they can get the real, original Rubik's?" hahahha. I wouldn't buy anything that wasn't Rubik's. Then, I got the Rubik's 2x2, which was supposed to be really small, but ended up being the size of a 3x3, and I freaked out thinking they'd sent me an eastsheen, until I found out that they'd changed them. It sucked so badly that I gave in and decided to try an eastsheen, and started buying DIY's. This all happened around September 09. I was around :45 then. I quickly started getting faster, breaking into the 30's, and freaked out when I hit the 20's. Once I got to around 22, I just stayed there forever. Now, I'm finally averaging around 17 to 18 sec, with more and more sub 15's recently, but still get lots of crappy 23's, 25's and even some 27's on really bad solves. That's just when I make stupid mistakes though, and really depends on which cube I'm using, even though, I've gotten sub 20 on all 20 of my cubes. I'm so glad that learning time period is behind me. I think I would kill myself if I had to go through it all,again.
 
You could be more abstract minded (more intuitive) than other people.

About Dan's video. This is always something wrong with every (this includes yours) tutorial video. But from what I gather, you have been successful on your video, Dan on his, Rob with his, etc. I guess it just depends on the personality and presentation. For example: Your video is pretty much "let's get down to business", Dan's video is like "hey this is easy and fun, you can do it too"
I'm not saying yours is bad by any means. :) Just trying to explain why i think why people like Dan Brown's tutorial :)

One thing really wrong with Dan's video is that he recommends Vaseline for lube. His version of the beginner's method is also just too slow. He has too many algs you have to repeat a million times. I learned from the little booklet that comes with the cube and thought it sucked for the same reasons. When I found Dan Harris's version of the begginer's method, it was a relief, because he really made it efficient and easy, at the same time, even throwing in some algs you'd need for Fridrich. (he uses A and U perms for solving the beginner's LL)
 
I first learned how to solve the cube with RobH0629's video series.
I learned some of Fridrich from cubestation.co.uk, and some from badmephisto
I learned Petrus from Lars' site/video tutorials.
 
Back
Top