UK masters

[MTGjumper]

I remember the thread for UK Open 2008 also had billions of replies

 

[chrisness]

Congratulations on beating me at MTS Chris. You had a little luck, but a good solve anyway. I had a 1:06 (also good) DNF because I had a missed slice-turn
Why can't we just replace "with feet" with "MTS"?

...

Match the scramble
[COLOR=lime][B]1    Christopher Ness    1:05.50[/B][/COLOR]
2    Robert Yau            1:46.69
3    Tan Wei Ken            2:21.08
4    Oliver Perge             2:27.18
5    Jude Wright            2:31.94
6    Charlie Flavour            2:37.94
7    Peter Harpham            2:58.21
8    Ron van Bruchem            3:03.80
9    Ben Whitmore            3:16.75
10    Greg Austin            3:33.46
11    Adam Wills            4:51.60
12    Michael Erskine            5:12.65
13    Francois Courtès    5:30.47
14    Richard McKearney       7:41.60
15    Lars Vandenbergh    7:46.29
[COLOR=red][B]16    Arnaud van Galen    DNF[/B][/COLOR]
16    Thom Power            DNF
16    James Dean Ludlow    DNF
16    Brett Ludlow            DNF
16    Joey Gouly            DNF

Thanks i think 6 move OLL and U perm definitely counts as very lucky for MTS though. I had only ever done this twice before though, and never timed

Chris

 

[Ron]

We have the more popular unofficial event results here:
http://www.speedcubing.com/results

Unfortunately the software cannot deal with team solves because there must be a relationship between the competitor result and the competitor. Which is not (yet) possible if there are two competitors for one result.

 

[MichaelErskine]

We have the more popular unofficial event results here:
http://www.speedcubing.com/results

Unfortunately the software cannot deal with team solves because there must be a relationship between the competitor result and the competitor. Which is not (yet) possible if there are two competitors for one result.

You really need to refactor that database into something relational

..I'm not volunteering BTW!

 

[brunson]

We have the more popular unofficial event results here:
http://www.speedcubing.com/results

Unfortunately the software cannot deal with team solves because there must be a relationship between the competitor result and the competitor. Which is not (yet) possible if there are two competitors for one result.

You really need to refactor that database into something relational

..I'm not volunteering BTW!

I will. It's pretty much what I do for a living.

From what I've seen, it seems pretty well normalized, to do team anything would only require a new cross reference table and a view to obscure it from existing queries.

 

[joey]

Inafter Brunson used an internet jargon creator for his last post.