proof that my f2l method isn't crap: F2L solve-15.55 seconds

[CuBeOrDiE]

I've recently posted a thread about a method I've created to solve the f2l of the rubik's cube(http://www.speedsolving.com/foru/showthread.php?t=13377), and I've got negative comments about it. To prove that it isn't crap, I've posted a video showing me solving the f2l using my method sub 16 seconds(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJAzE5tEDJE). Enjoy.

 

[Sa967St]

Or you just use...nevermind.
15.55 seconds isn't bad for F2L

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

thanks bro!

 

[StachuK1992]

thanks bro!

sis*

Still....

 

[brunson]

Or you just use...nevermind.
15.55 seconds isn't bad for F2L

Says the girl with the 12.53 single solve.

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

thanks bro!

sis*

Still....

**blush**

sorry 'bout that!

 

[RampageCuber]

 

[ThePizzaGuy92]

Lol...

 

[RampageCuber]

I still don't see whats wrong with this...

Except for the terrible tps....

 

[mark3]

I've recently posted a thread about a method I've created to solve the f2l of the rubik's cube(http://www.speedsolving.com/foru/showthread.php?t=13377), and I've got negative comments about it. To prove that it isn't crap, I've posted a video showing me solving the f2l using my method sub 16 seconds(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJAzE5tEDJE). Enjoy.

People only joked about it because it was basically a less efficent way of doing Petrus.

 

[PhillipEspinoza]

Don't mean to sound harsh but if your F2L method would get me a sub-6 avg for F2L, then I might consider. Other than that I don't see a point in investing in it too much for speed.

 

[brunson]

Enough with the Petrus solves. You're not adding anything to the discussion of his method and you've made your point.

 

[daeyoungyoon]

I'll still and probably forever say, "Or you can just use Petrus"

From the video, you didn't have that many pauses and your turning speed wasn't that slow but you only got 15 seconds for the F2L meaning you would've probably got around 20seconds for the entire solve. 15 seconds for F2L isn't that great in my opinion.

 

[RampageCuber]

Enough with the Petrus solves. You're not adding anything to the discussion of his method and you've made your point.

I've tried his method, not bad, but still, the edge inserting after the 1x2x3 block is slow...

 

[JLarsen]

Honestly I think this is just another one of those half ways between Fridrich and Petrus. Much like zz. I don't like it because I dislike everything about Fridrich, and I mean everything. So for me, I'm never going to like it. I like Petrus because it's a challenge, it's creative, and most of all, it's FUN.

 

[hr.mohr]

I'm sorry but your video proves nothing. It's a bad angle with annoying zoom and with a scramble that could have been prepared.

Please don't waste your time on haters, make some better videos and let the content speak for it self.

 

[Rikane]

I'm not sure, but do we even know what his normal average is? Normal being his F2L (I guess) average. If not...
Then we can't really say if it's really BAD or not. To him 15.55 might be good. Actually, to me, it's pretty decent as well.

 

[Lord Voldemort]

Honestly I think this is just another one of those half ways between Fridrich and Petrus. Much like zz. I don't like it because I dislike everything about Fridrich, and I mean everything. So for me, I'm never going to like it. I like Petrus because it's a challenge, it's creative, and most of all, it's FUN.

Really?
What's "it" that you're referring to there?

 

[daeyoungyoon]

The method which this thread is all about. Which isn't even his(Cubeordie or w/e his name is) method since everyone already knew about this method but never cared about it due to Petrus and such.

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

I'm not sure, but do we even know what his normal average is? Normal being his F2L (I guess) average. If not...
Then we can't really say if it's really BAD or not. To him 15.55 might be good. Actually, to me, it's pretty decent as well.

Good point. My ''normal'' f2l average is 16.5 seconds and I've beat that with my method; my new average is 16.2 seconds!