Waffle's Roux Tutorial

How has learning roux compared to fridrich? I can't watch the vids yet.... Hughesnet.
Roux is more easier to understand than Fridrich. The steps look as if they are intuitive.

At least I do not have to remember a near infinite amount of algorithms. :) I want to be able to do Roux, and Petrus... and fridrich, ortega, waterman, ZZ, and heisse... and possibly some minor variations. I want to have a great understanding of the cube, and have expert knowledge. Plus, I get bored easily so it is something to do.

I say roo, because I think of the food type of roux.
 
Last edited:
umm i need some help with the first block,, i always seem to build a 1x1x3 (2 corners 1 edge),, build another 1x1x3 block (2 edges 1 center) and put them together but its very ineffiecient,, any help?
 
umm i need some help with the first block,, i always seem to build a 1x1x3 (2 corners 1 edge),, build another 1x1x3 block (2 edges 1 center) and put them together but its very ineffiecient,, any help?

I first build a 1x1x2 block, just an edge and a center, then I build one of the c/e pairs that matched the other block, and put them together. Then I do the last c/e pair. I can always see the first c/e pair and the edge and center, and sometimes the whole first block.

How has learning roux compared to fridrich? I can't watch the vids yet.... Hughesnet.

I found it much easier, but it may have been easier because I already had some knowledge of the cube. But switching from an F2L method to a kind of Blockbuilding method was not as hard as I thought it would be.

I now have a sub-40 single using Roux, and a sub-50 average of 12 using Roux.
It is very nice.

Do you know full COLL/CMLL?

No, I just use the corners OLL algs and a T or Y perm.

And my times are lower than then. About 10 seconds lower.
 
umm i need some help with the first block,, i always seem to build a 1x1x3 (2 corners 1 edge),, build another 1x1x3 block (2 edges 1 center) and put them together but its very ineffiecient,, any help?

I first build a 1x1x2 block, just an edge and a center, then I build one of the c/e pairs that matched the other block, and put them together. Then I do the last c/e pair. I can always see the first c/e pair and the edge and center, and sometimes the whole first block.

mmm ok thanks :) umm do you use the M slice for the first block a lot?
 
If I am putting the last c/e pair in, and the corner is on the top, but the edge is on the bottom, next to the other pieces I have solved, then I use the M slice, but other than that not too much.
 
Just a question so that I know this method is dependable...what is your average for solving the cube and how long have you been using this method?
 
I started less than a week ago, and my average after warming up for a couple of solves is ~ 40-45 seconds. I think Gilles Roux, the guy who made the method, averaged sub-20.
 
Just a question so that I know this method is dependable...what is your average for solving the cube and how long have you been using this method?

1 year and 2 months. I like to take breaks and those add up to about 10 months worth of breaks

I'm usually 17-18 but my pb is 16.33 and I don't even know all the CMLLs

I started less than a week ago, and my average after warming up for a couple of solves is ~ 40-45 seconds. I think Gilles Roux, the guy who made the method, averaged sub-20.

EDIT 13-15
 
Last edited:
Just a question so that I know this method is dependable...what is your average for solving the cube and how long have you been using this method?

1 year and 2 months. I like to take breaks and those add up to about 10 months worth of breaks

I'm usually 17-18 but my pb is 16.33 and I don't even know all the CMLLs

I started less than a week ago, and my average after warming up for a couple of solves is ~ 40-45 seconds. I think Gilles Roux, the guy who made the method, averaged sub-20.

he does sub 12

Roux is sub-12? I always thought he was in the 13-14 range.
 
Back
Top