Inspection Time - what can you do?

Todd

Regular
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
227
I was reading on Macky's website the other day and he says during the inspection time he can see the cross and usually the first pair..

What can you guys do?

Personally i can only see the cross (pretty quickly) but cant see the first pair unless it is really obviuos or already conencted.
 
i can think of a way to build a 1x2x2 block and try to follow the next corner-edge pair (to extend it to a 1x2x3 block) while executing.
but thats about it.
 
cross should be easy to see.. i believe he first f2l is the hardest to get to. i don;t know anyone who can see the 2nd f2l pair lol.. so first f2l is almost the 'furthest' now.
 
i usually figure out 3 edges and get lazy with the 4th, and just insert it lazily from wherever it ends up... (i track it as i insert the first 3 edges). I can plan all 4 but im too lazy... its like extra 2-4 seconds :)
I haven't tried planning a pair as well. Sounds pretty hard for non-trivial crosses
 
I try to find a nice cross, and possibly a first corner edge pair, if not, just a corner that will be in the U layer. While do the cross, I find the edge with it so I can do that first pair immediately following the cross.
 
Yeah, I always find it helpful if I can see that a corner piece or an edge piece is already in place while I'm doing the cross; this helps me limit the number of possible cases down to a certain group, so my brain can recall the alg more quickly as opposed to if I just saw the case right when I put the cube in position to solve it
 
I can see the whole cross pretty quickly, and like pjk I find a corner that looks like it will be in the top layer and then find the matching edge, then follow them until the cross is done.
 
I was reading the title and thought: matyi can memorize the whole cube in preinspection.....
But just check for a nice cross and try to predict where your first pair will be is what I do on 3x3. On 2x2 I need my inspection time harder to see which case, and which 2nd case I will have on all faces and which method. On 4x4 I check the first and part of the 2nd centre. On 5x5 I mostly see the first centre. On megaminx I try to check for the whole star and on clock I see the first clock and the first of the one I will solve on the back. On pyraminx I see the first 3 basic edges + first edges of the first layer. On sq-1 I see how to gather all corners quickly and on magic..... ;)
 
I don't use an inspection time...

Is an inspection time just a way of getting a head start on a solve? I.e. "cheating"

One's ability to solve a puzzle should be based on the time they first look at it.

For example:
- If someone solves cube in 10 seconds and has a 15 seconds inspection time then add 15 seconds.
- Compare that with someone who solves it in less than 20 seconds without an inspection time.

Tim.
 
Is an inspection time just a way of getting a head start on a solve? I.e. "cheating"

One's ability to solve a puzzle should be based on the time they first look at it.
I guess you loathe speed bld even more? I personally think that one's ability to solve a puzzle should be based on how well he understand it and how many moves he needs. Rubik's Cube isn't a dexterity thing for me.

- If someone solves cube in 10 seconds and has a 15 seconds inspection time then add 15 seconds.
- Compare that with someone who solves it in less than 20 seconds without an inspection time.
Those two are different events, how should I compare them?
 
Last edited:
It's not cheating it's just planning and like johannes said I can't compare them because they ARE 2 different events
 
Tim, the inspection doesnt necessarily help that much.

The unofficialy record for solving the 3x3x3 without inspection is 11.77 seconds.
 
It's not cheating - I actually really like the fact that 15 second pre-inspection is a part of the solves - it gives another aspect to the solve... and it's just another thing you can work on perfecting, trying to push your boundaries with the cube inside your head :) its awesome
 
Those two are different events, how should I to compare them?

Ok, those two individual scenarios may not be directly comparable but if you took the average of 100 solves with a 15 second inspection time and the average of 100 solves without an inspection time then I'd predict that the later would have a slower solve time directly proportional to the inspection time.

Perhaps someone with a good memory could get the averages of their solves using different inspection times and no inspection time and report back to see if there are in fact any trends that would suggest an inspection time assists in a solve.

Tim.
 
Back
Top