Entirely ridiculously big numbers

we can be nice about double posting....
If it were a first-time offence, then I would agree, but this has already happened 3 other times, with all of them being the very NEXT post. Which, if he had just looked at any previous posts, he would've seen were already posted. And on NO occasion were they ever posted within minutes of each other, so it can be ruled out that it was posted at a similar enough time he wouldn't have known. Each occasion was hours after, giving plenty of time to realise he shouldn't have posted.
Screenshot 2026-05-04 at 11.42.54.png
Screenshot 2026-05-04 at 11.43.15.png
Screenshot 2026-05-04 at 11.45.03.png
 
If it were a first-time offence, then I would agree, but this has already happened 3 other times, with all of them being the very NEXT post. Which, if he had just looked at any previous posts, he would've seen were already posted. And on NO occasion were they ever posted within minutes of each other, so it can be ruled out that it was posted at a similar enough time he wouldn't have known. Each occasion was hours after, giving plenty of time to realise he shouldn't have posted.
View attachment 48284View attachment 48285View attachment 48286
It's in a different subforum

The main thread should probably be posted in either Puzzle Video Gallery or Puzzle Theory, since it is mainly of interest to puzzle theorists
 
If it were a first-time offence, then I would agree, but this has already happened 3 other times, with all of them being the very NEXT post. Which, if he had just looked at any previous posts, he would've seen were already posted. And on NO occasion were they ever posted within minutes of each other, so it can be ruled out that it was posted at a similar enough time he wouldn't have known. Each occasion was hours after, giving plenty of time to realise he shouldn't have posted.
View attachment 48284View attachment 48285View attachment 48286
Thanks for bringing it to my notice, will delete these posts, I did not know they were a duplicate.
 
If it were a first-time offence, then I would agree, but this has already happened 3 other times, with all of them being the very NEXT post. Which, if he had just looked at any previous posts, he would've seen were already posted. And on NO occasion were they ever posted within minutes of each other, so it can be ruled out that it was posted at a similar enough time he wouldn't have known. Each occasion was hours after, giving plenty of time to realise he shouldn't have posted.
View attachment 48284View attachment 48285View attachment 48286
Phew deleted all these posts.

I guess I have to double check and go slower henceforth to avoid duplicates.
 
Back
Top