JDAW6’S Cubing Progression // 20% ZBLL // 30% WV // I’ve Broken 12 SRs OFFICIALLY

Do i count my 1.7 Pyra Single?


  • Total voters
    15
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pb2 average for pyra (look at the ao100)
image.jpg
 
This average could have been real, since these scrambles aren't too out of reach for someone who is Sub-7, but it is unlikely. I got a 2.37 average (3/5 One-Looked) on these scrambles, and they are quite good, but a few points have to be made.

1. Seeing the Solutions
You found the exact same solution as me on all of the solves (Except 4 ofc). But it takes a lot of practice and learning to see good solutions, and even though they were easy scrambles. You average 7 and I think that it doesn't make sense how you can see a Sub-4 Solvers solution.
2. Fast Finger tricks and Turning
It takes a lot of time to build good turning and solutions, and assuming you didn't one-look, You need quite good recognition and turning style to get Sub-3 on the first two. The TPS is technically 3.01 and 3.88 on the first two, but counting recognition and pickup the TPS is about 4, which might be achievable but is unlikely. You also use the Qiyi MS, which is a budget pyraminx, and even though it is good, you have to be really good to turn that fast.
3. MAIN POINT: Scramble Luck
The scrambles were VERY Good. So good in fact, that after doing only 2000 solves, the chances of getting it are quite low. Like other people said, you probably got these scrambles from somewhere else and then used them to get these times. And to prove why this is unlikely, when you did 3x3, you get insane singles with insane scrambles, that even I had never gotten and I have been cubing for way longer than you. Then in 2x2, you get averages with 2-3 scrambles having one move Layers, and amazing cases, even though I'm quite sure you only got your 2x2 a year ago.
 
This average could have been real, since these scrambles aren't too out of reach for someone who is Sub-7, but it is unlikely. I got a 2.37 average (3/5 One-Looked) on these scrambles, and they are quite good, but a few points have to be made.

1. Seeing the Solutions
You found the exact same solution as me on all of the solves (Except 4 ofc). But it takes a lot of practice and learning to see good solutions, and even though they were easy scrambles. You average 7 and I think that it doesn't make sense how you can see a Sub-4 Solvers solution.
2. Fast Finger tricks and Turning
It takes a lot of time to build good turning and solutions, and assuming you didn't one-look, You need quite good recognition and turning style to get Sub-3 on the first two. The TPS is technically 3.01 and 3.88 on the first two, but counting recognition and pickup the TPS is about 4, which might be achievable but is unlikely. You also use the Qiyi MS, which is a budget pyraminx, and even though it is good, you have to be really good to turn that fast.
3. MAIN POINT: Scramble Luck
The scrambles were VERY Good. So good in fact, that after doing only 2000 solves, the chances of getting it are quite low. Like other people said, you probably got these scrambles from somewhere else and then used them to get these times. And to prove why this is unlikely, when you did 3x3, you get insane singles with insane scrambles, that even I had never gotten and I have been cubing for way longer than you. Then in 2x2, you get averages with 2-3 scrambles having one move Layers, and amazing cases, even though I'm quite sure you only got your 2x2 a year ago.
I one looked some of the solves if the V is 3 moves or less it isn’t hard to one look. Also, I didn’t even start Cubing one year ago how would I get a 2x2 before that.
 
This average could have been real, since these scrambles aren't too out of reach for someone who is Sub-7, but it is unlikely. I got a 2.37 average (3/5 One-Looked) on these scrambles, and they are quite good, but a few points have to be made.

1. Seeing the Solutions
You found the exact same solution as me on all of the solves (Except 4 ofc). But it takes a lot of practice and learning to see good solutions, and even though they were easy scrambles. You average 7 and I think that it doesn't make sense how you can see a Sub-4 Solvers solution.
2. Fast Finger tricks and Turning
It takes a lot of time to build good turning and solutions, and assuming you didn't one-look, You need quite good recognition and turning style to get Sub-3 on the first two. The TPS is technically 3.01 and 3.88 on the first two, but counting recognition and pickup the TPS is about 4, which might be achievable but is unlikely. You also use the Qiyi MS, which is a budget pyraminx, and even though it is good, you have to be really good to turn that fast.
3. MAIN POINT: Scramble Luck
The scrambles were VERY Good. So good in fact, that after doing only 2000 solves, the chances of getting it are quite low. Like other people said, you probably got these scrambles from somewhere else and then used them to get these times. And to prove why this is unlikely, when you did 3x3, you get insane singles with insane scrambles, that even I had never gotten and I have been cubing for way longer than you. Then in 2x2, you get averages with 2-3 scrambles having one move Layers, and amazing cases, even though I'm quite sure you only got your 2x2 a year ago.
He got a 2x2 only a few months ago, further cementing your point.

Having had a 2x2 for over a year now, i have gotten maybe 2 premade layers and no timed 4 movers. And with 3x3, apparently he has gotten over 5 LL skips at this point. Incredibly unlikely, even if he does have a 10k+ session. Like i said, i've been cubing for over a year and a half and i've never even gotten a LL skip, and not even over 5 OLL skips. Im just gonna block this thread, i don't care if it's copium.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top