JDAW6’S Cubing Progression // 20% ZBLL // 30% WV // I’ve Broken 12 SRs OFFICIALLY

Do i count my 1.7 Pyra Single?


  • Total voters
    15
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not at home, so I don't have my computer on me. Is it possible for anyone else to use cube explorer or another common solving site and reverse the solution to see if it matches up with this? If it does, then this is a set up scramble.
It does not even solve the scramble. With the scramble given, the given solution does not solve it. What it looks like is that he just made some scramble and put a random reconstruction on it.
 
Last edited:
It does not even solve the scramble. With the scramble given, the given solution does not solve it. What it looks like is that he just made some scramble and put a random reconstruction on it.
The solution does not solve it, because he wrote it incorrectly. It should be D U' R U R' D' instead of D R U R' D' for the second pair.
Either way it is definetely faked, no questions asked.
 
I tried putting this through insertion finder to see if the scramble was messed up (I inversed the solution and put it as the scramble and used the inverse scramble as my skeleton) and it said "there's too many insertions, I don't want to do it."
 
I tried putting this through insertion finder to see if the scramble was messed up (I inversed the solution and put it as the scramble and used the inverse scramble as my skeleton) and it said "there's too many insertions, I don't want to do it."
Either way, being off by a 6 cycle of edges, a 2 cycle of corners, a 3 cycle of corners, and another 3 cycle of corners seems pretty odd if they miss scrambled.

This rules miss scramble out of the equation.


So now we know that the scramble was either horribly incorrectly inversed from a cube solver or it was copied incorrectly from cstimer, or the solution was incorrect.

When I use the input feature and input the exact time, there are only 2 moves that are in a different row.

2 moves can't solve the cycle case OP was off by.

This leads me to believe that the OP either messed up their solution, or that OP had inversed the scramble from a cube solver incorrectly.
 
No cheating sub6

R D' F2 D R2 D' R2 D L2 D' B2 D' F U' F D B2 L U' B F



z2 // INSPECTION

F’ B’ D L’ R’ // CROSS (5)

L’ U L // RG PAIR (3)

y D R U R’ D’ // OG PAIR (5)

(R U R’ U’)3 // RB PAIR (12)

U2 L’ U L U2 L U L // OB PAIR (8)

F (R U R’ U’)2 F’ // OLL (10)

U’ // AUF (1)



Time 5.934

Moves 44 STM

TPS 7.41
44 STM...
Yeah this is definitely legit
 
R D' F2 D R2 D' R2 D L2 D' B2 D' F U' F D B2 L U' B F



z2 // INSPECTION

F’ B’ D L’ R’ // CROSS (5)

L’ U L // RG PAIR (3)

y D U’ R U R’ D’ // OG PAIR (6)

y (R U R’ U’)3 // RB PAIR (12)

U2 L’ U L U2 L’ U L // OB PAIR (8)

F (R U R’ U’)2 F’ // OLL (10)

U’ // AUF (1)



Time 5.934

Moves 45 STM

TPS 7.57


Ill also make video proof
19ED8C3E-D46A-4D93-8D23-06C9801F934E.png
19ED8C3E-D46A-4D93-8D23-06C9801F934E.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top