what puzzle do i learn first?

[Clock_Enthusiast]

I personally love a good old clonk. It’s a great head exercise.

Excellent choice.

 

[Nevinator2]

so basically i have all wca puzzles except clock

but i am bad and sometimes i don’t even know how to solve some of the puzzles

i only know 3x3

what’s easy and maybe i could learn and get fast at first?

2x2, or pyraminx

 

[abunickabhi]

If you have a lot of brainpower, I would suggest learning 5x5 Blindfolded first.

 

[Ryan Lam]

If you have a lot of brainpower, I would suggest learning 5x5 Blindfolded first.

i am stupid

 

[Ryan Lam]

so basically i have all wca puzzles except clock

but i am bad and sometimes i don’t even know how to solve some of the puzzles

i only know 3x3

what’s easy and maybe i could learn and get fast at first?

i learned ortega at last

 

[EthanMCuber]

Nice! Ortega is my main 2x2 method and you can get quite fast with it!

The next puzzles I would learn are:
Pyraminx (my favorite event) with LBL or Intuitive L4E
Skewb with Beginner’s
4x4 with Beginner’s

 

[Ryan Lam]

okay

Nice! Ortega is my main 2x2 method and you can get quite fast with it!

The next puzzles I would learn are:
Pyraminx (my favorite event) with LBL or Intuitive L4E
Skewb with Beginner’s
4x4 with Beginner’s

 

[Thom S.]

For Sq-1, there theoretically does exist a Layer-By-Layer Beginner method. But I have only heard of two people that started with it. Almost all users jump straight into either Vandenbergh or Lin.

Squab is the only important event anyway.

 

[hyn]

If you have a lot of brainpower, I would suggest learning 5x5 Blindfolded first.

And then after uve learnt it, u can move on to harder events like 2x2

 

[Nevinator2]

I have a sub 20 single, and know 2 look oll, and 2 look pll. What alg set, or skill should I learn next?

 

[Thom S.]

I have a sub 20 single, and know 2 look oll, and 2 look pll. What alg set, or skill should I learn next?

PLL

 

[Deleted member 36445]

I have a sub 20 single, and know 2 look oll, and 2 look pll. What alg set, or skill should I learn next?

5x5 bld

 

[Jorian Meeuse]

5x5 bld

Easiest event yo

 

[Deleted member 36445]

Easiest event yo

someone should update the wiki on the memes entry with "5x5 bld is the easiest event yo"

 

[ajw9668]

I have a sub 20 single, and know 2 look oll, and 2 look pll. What alg set, or skill should I learn next?

Nevin I think that you should learn some basic but more advanced f2l algorithms and then start to learn full PLL

 

[OldSwiss]

I have a sub 20 single, and know 2 look oll, and 2 look pll. What alg set, or skill should I learn next?

I would also recommend PLL and probably some easy OLL cases.
There are some OLL, where you already know the alg an just have to do them in the right orientation of the cube.

Basically all in the sexyMove category here

OLL Groups

There are a little over half of the OLL algorithms on this page. This page has them grouped by similar movements that I find make them easy to remember. These movements are often called...

www.speedcubereview.com

 

[SdnS]

so basically i have all wca puzzles except clock

but i am bad and sometimes i don’t even know how to solve some of the puzzles

i only know 3x3

what’s easy and maybe i could learn and get fast at first?

You can never go wrong learning 2x2, it's fast and easy. Pyraminx is by far the easiest to learn and get faster at, and other than that Skewb is pretty simple but not as fun as the other two in my opinion.

 

[arbivara]

If you know 3x3, you should be able to figure 2x2 by yourself, since that's just like solving the corners of 3x3. You might find it hard at first from the lack of center acting as a reference, but you may consider any random piece as solved and use it as reference instead. BTW, I don't know which method you use for the 3x3 (layer by layer, probably?), but regardless which one you must solve the corners at some point, so voilà, you also know how to solve the 2x2. Pyra should also be somewhat feasible to figure out, specially if you know the sledge hammer maneuver. And even if you don't figure it out, you might ending solving it "by accident" (i.e., solving it without realizing how you did it)

 

[Ryan Lam]

If you know 3x3, you should be able to figure 2x2 by yourself, since that's just like solving the corners of 3x3. You might find it hard at first from the lack of center acting as a reference, but you may consider any random piece as solved and use it as reference instead. BTW, I don't know which method you use for the 3x3 (layer by layer, probably?), but regardless which one you must solve the corners at some point, so voilà, you also know how to solve the 2x2. Pyra should also be somewhat feasible to figure out, specially if you know the sledge hammer maneuver. And even if you don't figure it out, you might ending solving it "by accident" (i.e., solving it without realizing how you did it)

hi i use cfop and i use ortega and i use layer by layer for pminx

 

[CatSharked]

hi i use cfop and i use ortega and i use layer by layer for pminx

If you know these puzzles 4x4+ should be pretty simple. do them in this order: 4x4, 5x5, 6x6, 7x7