LukasCubes
Member
here, sub-7 with waterman. Scramble is in video description and I will make a seperate video reconing this later this week.
Yeah I was recording like 20 solves earlier, but i done deleted everything except the 6.7. Sorry. I will film more solves for now on. Also that solve wasnt faked for your information.Hypothetically, given that the footage starts with the scramble already visible, you could have rehearsed the scramble before recording. Easiest way around this would be to provide the recording starting from a few solves earlier, although even then there are ways to fake it regardless.
I'm terrible at telling whether not-obviously-faked solves are fake, so I'm going to withhold judgment on whether that happened.
Hmmmmmm i might think about that for the future. Like I said before I deleted the recording of like 20 solves earlier including a sub-10 that was misscrambled.Did you record this whole session and only take the part where you had the seven second solve? If so, then could you maybe post a video with the five or so solves before?
Phew, I feel so relieved now!Also that solve wasnt faked for your information.
I understand that lol. This time I will try not to get in an argument about.I'm not accusing you of anything, but you have to understand that if you get a really good time using an unconventional method without providing proof that you're capable of such times, it's completely reasonable for people to be sceptical.
Just like normal. I pretended the (supposed) top midges was on the top (even tho they werent) and did the alg. it is also probably one of like 2 or 3 algs I know from that set lol.How did you manage to recognize the case for Waterman Set 1 when the R slice was offset by 1 move?
x2 M' U M' U' r' U2 M U M' // Waterman set 1 Alg (1 Move Offset)How did you manage to recognize the case for Waterman Set 1 when the R slice was offset by 1 move?
LBL Efficiency is AmazingWaterman Lookahead is Amazing
advanced layer by layer maybeLBL Efficiency is Amazing
you do realize he's being sarcastic right...advanced layer by layer maybe
I beat the odds, i beat it.I'll withhold judgement as well, but you do have to realize how incredibly unlikely it is that you would both get 3 overall PBs (and WBs) in such a short span of time as well as manage to capture them all on video?
but either way waterman looks cool and im glad that you're enjoying it
yes, but when i was saying waterman lookahead is amazing, I was being serious. There is still no reason to be sarcastic here when I am trying to have a serious discussion here.you do realize he's being sarcastic right...
We are all tryingI am trying to have a serious discussion here.
bro this aint funny. I just post a sub-7 and people now just turn this into "faked solve" and sarcasm and jokes but it aint funny. People need to stop.We are all trying
LOL
yet here youThis time I will try not to get in an argument about.
The more recognition and praise you expect for "a sub-7" the more likely it seems to be fake. You should realize that the video is as much evidence as your word basically. So well. good for you and we hope to see some good solves from you at the comps!I just post a sub-7 and people now just turn this into "faked solve" and sarcasm and jokes but it aint funny
in an argument? I was never in one today at least.yet here you
The more recognition and praise you expect for "a sub-7" the more likely it seems to be fake. You should realize that the video is as much evidence as your word basically. So well. good for you and we hope to see some good solves from you at the comps!
Btw - I also managed to get a lucky single on camera!
Sorry doesn't count, under 20 movesyet here you
The more recognition and praise you expect for "a sub-7" the more likely it seems to be fake. You should realize that the video is as much evidence as your word basically. So well. good for you and we hope to see some good solves from you at the comps!
Btw - I also managed to get a lucky single on camera!