6.42 3x3 ao5 w/ZZ

I like these debates but nobody can actually prove through Statistical Analysis whether one Variant is better or worse Objectively speaking as speed-cubing, speed-cubers, and algs are changing all the time. Is anything better than 4LLL obviously but people can still be sub 12 with 4LLL they just focus on more important parts of the solve like F2L and 1rst step efficiency.
I was just saying its viable my guy!
 
All methods are bad except [the method I use] and all other methods are terrible and are not good in any way! Oh, you wanna hear my reasoning? [Terrible reasoning that doesn’t make sense] My reason is incorrect? Nope it isn’t, no way it can be wrong Lalalalala I can’t hear you.
Yep that about sums up every method debate I've ever read haha
 
Why do people write whole essays trying to prove someone wrong whenever people say [x method] is the best? If someone thinks CFOP is the best, that's their opinion, you don't have to spend so much time going on about why you disagree
 
Why do people write whole essays trying to prove someone wrong whenever people say [x method] is the best? If someone thinks CFOP is the best, that's their opinion, you don't have to spend so much time going on about why you disagree
Yeah, that's like "Bro Roux is better than CFOP skreeee Bink bop it's the best it good fast much speed doge yeet"
And the other person must be like:
"Yeah, I've done 10000 solves on CFOP, let's switch to Roux because one person suggested it! Yay!"
Like that's ever gonna happen
 
Back
Top