2.64 Single (Jackmennie_23 on IG)

If Feliks(or Max, or Jay, or whatever) claimed a 2.64, had no video, had this scramble(which we've already discussed is suspicious), wasn't counting it as his PB or WB, and had it posted by his friend instead of himself, then yeah. I'd call him out.
I also agree that it isn't very likely, but im fairly sure some other dude got the exact same scramble (not him) on cstimer @leonspeedcuber (inst) or smth like that got a 3.1 on it
 
I also agree that it isn't very likely, but im fairly sure some other dude got the exact same scramble (not him) on cstimer @leonspeedcuber (inst) or smth like that got a 3.1 on it
Are you saying two people got the exact same scramble on 3x3 indenpendly of each other? The chances of a repeat scramble a so incredibly low that is almost impossible.
 
The oddest thing is that the scramble was 4-gen. I have never had a scramble on csTimer that wasn't 6-gen.
I would be interested if a 4-gen scramble is even possible on csTimer @qq280833822
Code:
js> function test(n)
{
        let faces = 'UDLRFB';
        let histogram = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0];
        for (let i = 0; i < n; i++)
        {
                let s = min2phase.solve(min2phase.randomCube());
                let faces_used = 0;
                for (let f of faces)
                {
                        if (s.indexOf(f) !== -1) {faces_used++;}
                }
                histogram[faces_used]++;
        }
        return histogram;
}
js> test(10000)
[0, 0, 0, 0, 8, 568, 9424]
4-gen is rare, but not that rare. You've probably had a couple without realising it.

(I'm aware that csTimer doesn't exactly use min2phase.solve but I have my local copy of min2phase.js modified to reflect that.)
 
You can just type in scrambles...


No you're right, he messed up when trying to make it look legit.

That makes no logical sense. Why aren't there more errors? If it really was a cropping issue, it would probably be consistent along the X/Y axis. Let's admit it, we all know it's fake.
the thing is that after the first F2 there was space for about 2 more moves in the line before the next F2 in the line below.
 
Ok, this solve wasnt done by me, and i dont have a personal opinion on whether this is fake or real. My friend just sent me an easy scramble. Im just saying, if this solve was genned on cstimer (unlikely but their is a chance), and feliks or max got this scramble, i dont think anyone would be going up to him and saying, totally legit, or stop faking solves.
if Feliks or max got this scramble people would believe them as they have nothing to gain seeing as they already have actual records and people know
everyone hated on many solves, such as the andrew huang wr and the sameer agarwal wb
people didn‘t hate on Andrew Huangs Wr they just said the scramble is dumb and he literally said him he found it dumb and assumed it was a misscramble. People said sameers was fake because he got a sub 3 (insanely rare for someone at his average) claimed it as WB people pointed out there was a faster solve and then he pops up 2 days later with ANOTHER sub 3 that was WB this time. That sort of thing just doesn’t happen.
 
Ok, this solve wasnt done by me, and i dont have a personal opinion on whether this is fake or real. My friend just sent me an easy scramble. Im just saying, if this solve was genned on cstimer (unlikely but their is a chance), and feliks or max got this scramble, i dont think anyone would be going up to him and saying, totally legit, or stop faking solves.
That’s because they are established cubers who wouldn’t be dumb enough to fake a solve, knowing that if they were found out it would destroy their reputation. The person who did this fake solve has nothing to lose.
 
Back
Top