alexiscubing
Veteran
I got four free pairs in a 5.88 which is exactly why im not counting it. i have evidence as well, i was doing comp sim with friends. (not this scramble btw)
2.64 Single (Jackmennie_23 on IG)
- Thread starter alexiscubing
- Start date
brododragon
Veteran
What about a LL skip? 21 moves is FMC, not 3x3. Almost half the move-count is LL on an average solve. This solve was set up.
alexiscubing
Veteran
its not impossible tho
brododragon
Veteran
It's not. But when you add it all together, there's overwhelming amounts of evidence.
Username: Username:
Veteran
you two are flooding me with notifs!
alexiscubing
Veteran
got on cstimer 22/4
brododragon
Veteran
So we've forgotten that Inspect exists?
alexiscubing
Veteran
i thought you said you wanted a screenshot of the cstimer solve
i have given it to you
what else do you want
i have given it to you
what else do you want
brododragon
Veteran
There's just too many things wrong with this. It would stink if it was legit, but 9/10 it's not, and I can't just believe someone for that 1/10 of the time. I wish I could get myself to believe this, but the list of strange things is just too much.
alexiscubing
Veteran
why would it stink?
i thought i said pls dont hate on him
i thought i said pls dont hate on him
tasguitar7
Regular
The arguments made here aren't hating on him. The argument is that the simplest explanation of what is being presented is that the solve is fake. It is not impossible that the solve is real, but certainly given the information we have in this thread it is the outcome which has less supporting evidence. There is not much here to make such an unlikely circumstance seem real and people are naturally suspicious of believing unlikely circumstances.
I think brododragon said it best:
There is just nothing convincing here and the default for something so unlikely is disbelief.
weatherman223
Veteran
It’s partially cut off but do those last 2 digits say .16?
Yeah, any small amount of faith that I had in this is now gone. Now going to Cube Explorer to see if it was grabbed and inputted from there.
Samuel Baird
Regular
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2020
- Messages
- 114
- Location
- Saratoga Springs, Utah
- WCA ID
- 2016BAIR01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
I already tried that out and couldn't find anything, he definitely genned that scramble though.
weatherman223
Veteran
Yup, couldn’t find anything of note either
BradyCubes08
Regular
I tried doing the ruwix cube solver thing with this scramble (where you input colors for each sticker on your scrambled cube and it generates a solution) and the solution came out as the inverse of the scramble, which means he could have just set this up, put it in the solver, inverse the solution and bam you've got yourself a legit looking fake solve!
ProStar
Legend
You can put your own scrambles into csTimer to have them show up(which is what I do for sub-x races), then when you look at a solve it will seem as though that was a naturally generated scramble
brododragon
Veteran
Wow. That's extremely strange, given that Ruwix doesn't have an optimal solver.
fun at the joy
Veteran
The oddest thing is that the scramble was 4-gen. I have never had a scramble on csTimer that wasn't 6-gen.
Maybe he selected the EOLine option.
Maybe he selected the EOLine option.
ProStar
Legend
Makes since, the solve was 21 moves, which wouldn't have been optimal
brododragon
Veteran
But usually it can't even get sub-25.
